We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Mexico: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metabolic Syndrome and related Disorders 2018 October
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is closely linked with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular diseases. The T2DM is one of the major causes of mortality and public health concern in Mexico. Some studies reported MetS prevalence in different regions from Mexico. However, a systematic report or meta-analysis on MetS prevalence is not available. The aim of this study was to estimate the pooled prevalence of MetS among apparently healthy Mexican adults.
METHODS: A systematic review was done of scientific articles published and available from different sources, including MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and SCIELO. The overall prevalence of MetS and prevalence based on different diagnostic criteria [National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI), and World Health Organization (WHO)] were pooled using a random-effects model, and the results were presented in a forest plot. The study was performed based on the criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA).
RESULTS: Altogether, 15 studies were included in the systematic meta-analysis. The estimated prevalence of MetS, based on different criteria, was as follows: IDF 54% (95% CI 0.44-0.63), AHA/NHLBI 48% (95% CI 0.34-0.62), ATP III 36% (95% CI 0.30-0.42), and WHO 31% (95% CI 0.04-0.81). According to the Der Simonian-Laird random-effects model, a pooled prevalence of MetS in Mexico was 41% (95% CI 0.34-0.47).
CONCLUSIONS: This study reported a high prevalence of MetS among healthy Mexican adults, in comparison with reports from other countries, including United States and Latin America. An urgent need to control and prevent MetS and its consequent health complications in Mexican populations is recommended.
METHODS: A systematic review was done of scientific articles published and available from different sources, including MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and SCIELO. The overall prevalence of MetS and prevalence based on different diagnostic criteria [National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI), and World Health Organization (WHO)] were pooled using a random-effects model, and the results were presented in a forest plot. The study was performed based on the criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA).
RESULTS: Altogether, 15 studies were included in the systematic meta-analysis. The estimated prevalence of MetS, based on different criteria, was as follows: IDF 54% (95% CI 0.44-0.63), AHA/NHLBI 48% (95% CI 0.34-0.62), ATP III 36% (95% CI 0.30-0.42), and WHO 31% (95% CI 0.04-0.81). According to the Der Simonian-Laird random-effects model, a pooled prevalence of MetS in Mexico was 41% (95% CI 0.34-0.47).
CONCLUSIONS: This study reported a high prevalence of MetS among healthy Mexican adults, in comparison with reports from other countries, including United States and Latin America. An urgent need to control and prevent MetS and its consequent health complications in Mexican populations is recommended.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app