We have located links that may give you full text access.
Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients with pneumonia hospitalized in ICUs of US medical centres (2015-17).
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2018 July 28
Background: Treatment of infections in the ICU represents a great challenge, especially infections caused by Gram-negative organisms. Rapid introduction of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is crucial to reduce mortality, and resistance rates in the ICU can be elevated due to antimicrobial selection pressure.
Objectives: To evaluate the frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients with pneumonia hospitalized in ICUs.
Methods: A total of 6091 bacterial isolates were consecutively collected from 75 US medical centres in 2015-17 as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) programme and tested for susceptibility to multiple antimicrobial agents at a central laboratory by reference broth microdilution methods.
Results: The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (30.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.7%), Klebsiella spp. (11.8%), Enterobacter spp. (8.3%), Escherichia coli (7.1%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.1%). Colistin (99.8% susceptible), ceftazidime/avibactam (96.8% susceptible in 2015-17 and 96.2% in 2017) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (96.5% susceptible in 2017) were the most active compounds against P. aeruginosa. Ceftazidime/avibactam (100.0% susceptible), amikacin (99.4% susceptible) and meropenem (97.6% susceptible) were the most active compounds against Enterobacteriaceae. S. maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii exhibited high resistance rates to most antimicrobials tested.
Conclusions: Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 67.1% of the patients and P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae represented >80% of these organisms. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin provided the best coverage against Gram-negative organisms overall.
Objectives: To evaluate the frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients with pneumonia hospitalized in ICUs.
Methods: A total of 6091 bacterial isolates were consecutively collected from 75 US medical centres in 2015-17 as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) programme and tested for susceptibility to multiple antimicrobial agents at a central laboratory by reference broth microdilution methods.
Results: The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (30.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.7%), Klebsiella spp. (11.8%), Enterobacter spp. (8.3%), Escherichia coli (7.1%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.1%). Colistin (99.8% susceptible), ceftazidime/avibactam (96.8% susceptible in 2015-17 and 96.2% in 2017) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (96.5% susceptible in 2017) were the most active compounds against P. aeruginosa. Ceftazidime/avibactam (100.0% susceptible), amikacin (99.4% susceptible) and meropenem (97.6% susceptible) were the most active compounds against Enterobacteriaceae. S. maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii exhibited high resistance rates to most antimicrobials tested.
Conclusions: Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 67.1% of the patients and P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae represented >80% of these organisms. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin provided the best coverage against Gram-negative organisms overall.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app