We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of an Experimental Pain Model by Noncompartmental Analysis of Results from a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial.
Pain Physician 2018 July
BACKGROUND: Understanding analgesic pharmacodynamics (PD) in the elderly is key to optimising pain management. Electrically stimulated pain models (ESPM) permit assessment of pain responses in humans. C and A-delta sensory fibres convey pain and respond to low frequency electrical stimulus (5 and 250 Hz, respectively). Human research suggests pain tolerance threshold (PTT) is similar or decreases with age.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an ESPM is able to detect a difference in PTT in elderly (>/= 75 years) and young (20-40 years) subjects after single dose administration of a placebo and tramadol, a low potency analgesic.
STUDY DESIGN: Two-cohort, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.
METHODS: A noncompartmental analysis of data at 17 timepoints on 5 Hz and 250 Hz PTT over 24 h.
RESULTS: Young (16) and elderly (13) patients showed similar baseline (E0) PTT between active and placebo both overall and by age group in both frequencies. Net drug effect took into account negative and positive changes from E0. In the elderly, net peak effect on PTT produced by active treatment was significantly greater for both 5 Hz (34%) and 250 Hz (30%). Net area under the 24-h effect-time curve during active treatment was significantly higher for both 5 Hz (163 %) and 250 Hz (175%) stimulations in the elderly. No clinically significant difference was observed in the young.
LIMITATIONS: High variability in young subjects, despite efforts to remove outliers limited our ability to draw conclusions in that age group. Generalizability of results obtained from an experimental pain model in volunteers to treatment of elderly patients may be limited.
CONCLUSION: ESPM can detect a difference for pain tolerance threshold between placebo and tramadol administration in the elderly. Although both 5 Hz and 250 Hz stimulations can detect a difference, the effect size for 5 Hz is larger and seems more precise and reliable, particularly in the elderly.
KEY WORDS: Electrical pain model, elderly, geriatric, tramadol, placebo, opioid, area under the effect curve, noncompartmental analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an ESPM is able to detect a difference in PTT in elderly (>/= 75 years) and young (20-40 years) subjects after single dose administration of a placebo and tramadol, a low potency analgesic.
STUDY DESIGN: Two-cohort, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.
METHODS: A noncompartmental analysis of data at 17 timepoints on 5 Hz and 250 Hz PTT over 24 h.
RESULTS: Young (16) and elderly (13) patients showed similar baseline (E0) PTT between active and placebo both overall and by age group in both frequencies. Net drug effect took into account negative and positive changes from E0. In the elderly, net peak effect on PTT produced by active treatment was significantly greater for both 5 Hz (34%) and 250 Hz (30%). Net area under the 24-h effect-time curve during active treatment was significantly higher for both 5 Hz (163 %) and 250 Hz (175%) stimulations in the elderly. No clinically significant difference was observed in the young.
LIMITATIONS: High variability in young subjects, despite efforts to remove outliers limited our ability to draw conclusions in that age group. Generalizability of results obtained from an experimental pain model in volunteers to treatment of elderly patients may be limited.
CONCLUSION: ESPM can detect a difference for pain tolerance threshold between placebo and tramadol administration in the elderly. Although both 5 Hz and 250 Hz stimulations can detect a difference, the effect size for 5 Hz is larger and seems more precise and reliable, particularly in the elderly.
KEY WORDS: Electrical pain model, elderly, geriatric, tramadol, placebo, opioid, area under the effect curve, noncompartmental analysis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app