Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of two low flow interfaces for measurement of mobilities and stability constants by affinity capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry.

Affinity capillary electrophoresis (ACE) is typically used for the determination of stability constant, Kst , of weak to moderately strong complexes. Sensitive detection such as mass spectrometry (MS) is required for extension of ACE methodology for estimation of Kst of stronger complexes. Consequently, an efficient interface for hyphenation of CE with MS detection is necessary. For evaluation of interfaces for electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection in ACE conditions, potassium-crown ether complexation was used as model system. The effective mobilities of the crown ether ligands and the Kst of their potassium complexes were measured/determined by ACE-ESI/MS using two lab-made interfaces: (i) a sheathless porous tip CE-ESI/MS interface and (ii) a nano-sheath liquid flow CE-ESI/MS interface, and, in turn, compared with those obtained by ACE with UV spectrophotometric detection. Apparent stability constant of potassium-crown ether complexes in 60/40 (v/v) methanol/water mixed solvent, pH* 5.5, was about 1300 L/mol for dibenzo-18-crown-6, 1600 L/mol for benzo-18-crown-6 and 5200 L/mol for 18-crown-6 ligands, respectively. It was observed that electrophoretic mobilities from CE-MS experiments differ from reference values determined by UV detection by ∼7% depending on the CE-MS interface used. Good agreement of CE-MS and CE-UV data was achieved for nano-sheath liquid flow interface, in which the spray potential and the CE separation potential can be effectively decoupled. As for sheathless porous tip interface, a correction procedure involving a mobility marker has been proposed. It provides typically only ca. 1% difference of effective mobilities and Kst values obtained from CE-MS data as compared to those received by the reference ACE-UV method.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app