Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Randomized Controlled Trial of Autologous Endometrial Coculture Versus Traditional in Vitro Fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if autologous endometrial cell coculture improves embryo development and clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) (control, n=73) or autologous endometrial cell coculture (AECC) (n=61). All patients underwent endometrial biopsy on cycle day 5–10 post luteinizing hormone surge. A total of 129 patients underwent embryo transfer (69 control, 60 AECC). Clinical outcomes as well as embryonic quality measures were then compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age, day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone, number of oocytes collected, and clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Embryo development was overall similar, with the exception that embryonic grade was significantly better with AECC than with control: 1.5 (0.04) vs. 2.6 (0.03), p<0.0001. There was no difference in implantation, live birth or multiple gestation rates. CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest prospective randomized controlled trials of AECC versus traditional IVF. There was significant improvement in embryo morphology in the coculture group, although clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. Further studies are necessary to achieve enough power to fully delineate the effects of coculture on IVF outcome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app