We have located links that may give you full text access.
Assessment of the degree of abdominal myosteatosis by magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with diabetes, prediabetes and healthy controls from the general population.
European Journal of Radiology 2018 August
OBJECTIVES: Intra- and intermyocellular lipid deposition and adipose tissue are part of glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance; however, their role in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear. We assessed differences in the degree of abdominal myosteatosis among subjects with T2DM and prediabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asymptomatic subjects from the general population were classified as subjects with T2DM, prediabetes or healthy controls and underwent multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (TR 8.90 ms, six echo times, flip-angle 4°). Abdominal myosteatosis was quantified as proton-density fat-fraction (PDFFmuscle ) by a standardized segmentation-algorithm. Cardiometabolic risk factors were prospectively obtained in a comprehensive health assessment and visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) were quantified semi-automatically. Uni- and multivariate quantile regression were used to examine associations.
RESULTS: Among 349 included subjects (mean age: 56.0 ± 8.0years, 56.7% males), 45 were classified as subjects with T2DM and 84 with prediabetes (12.9% and 24.1%; respectively). Median PDFFmuscle was significantly higher in subjects with T2DM and prediabetes compared to healthy controls (13.1% (IQR10.5-16.6%); 11.1% (IQR8.9-15.0%) and 10.1% (IQR7.5-13.3%); respectively, p < 0.001). The observed differences were independent of age and gender (all p < 0.002) but attenuated after adjustment for BMI (β: -0.02, 95%CI: -1.49 to 1.44, p = 0.974; β: 0.47, 95%CI: -0.91 to 1.86, p = 0.506; prediabetes and T2DM, respectively). This effect was attributable to VAT, which remained independently associated with PDFFmuscle after full adjustment (β: 0.01, 95%CI: 0.01-0.02, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the degree of abdominal myosteatosis between subjects with T2DM, prediabetes and healthy controls, that may be confounded by VAT. However, abdominal myosteatosis by MRI might serve as a cardiometabolic imaging-biomarker, specifically in the setting of impaired glucose metabolism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asymptomatic subjects from the general population were classified as subjects with T2DM, prediabetes or healthy controls and underwent multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (TR 8.90 ms, six echo times, flip-angle 4°). Abdominal myosteatosis was quantified as proton-density fat-fraction (PDFFmuscle ) by a standardized segmentation-algorithm. Cardiometabolic risk factors were prospectively obtained in a comprehensive health assessment and visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) were quantified semi-automatically. Uni- and multivariate quantile regression were used to examine associations.
RESULTS: Among 349 included subjects (mean age: 56.0 ± 8.0years, 56.7% males), 45 were classified as subjects with T2DM and 84 with prediabetes (12.9% and 24.1%; respectively). Median PDFFmuscle was significantly higher in subjects with T2DM and prediabetes compared to healthy controls (13.1% (IQR10.5-16.6%); 11.1% (IQR8.9-15.0%) and 10.1% (IQR7.5-13.3%); respectively, p < 0.001). The observed differences were independent of age and gender (all p < 0.002) but attenuated after adjustment for BMI (β: -0.02, 95%CI: -1.49 to 1.44, p = 0.974; β: 0.47, 95%CI: -0.91 to 1.86, p = 0.506; prediabetes and T2DM, respectively). This effect was attributable to VAT, which remained independently associated with PDFFmuscle after full adjustment (β: 0.01, 95%CI: 0.01-0.02, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the degree of abdominal myosteatosis between subjects with T2DM, prediabetes and healthy controls, that may be confounded by VAT. However, abdominal myosteatosis by MRI might serve as a cardiometabolic imaging-biomarker, specifically in the setting of impaired glucose metabolism.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app