We have located links that may give you full text access.
Dual-energy CT-based iodine quantification to differentiate abdominal malignant lymphoma from lymph node metastasis.
European Journal of Radiology 2018 August
PURPOSE: To investigate the value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-derived iodine and fat quantification in differentiating malignant abdominal lymphoma from lymph node metastasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 59 patients (39 men; mean age, 62.7 years) with histopathologically-confirmed diagnosis of either malignant lymphoma or lymph node metastasis were included. For each lesion, contrast-enhanced attenuation, as well as DECT-derived iodine density and fat fraction measurements were recorded. Mean attenuation and material density values were compared between malignant lymphomas and lymph node metastases. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was adopted to estimate the optimal threshold for discriminating between both entities. A control group (n = 60) was analyzed for comparison of attenuation and material density values of normal abdominal lymph nodes.
RESULTS: Assessment of DECT-derived iodine density and fat fraction values revealed significant differences between lymph node metastases (1.7 ± 0.4 mg/ml and 15.5 ± 7.3%) and malignant lymphomas (2.5 ± 0.5 mg/ml and 26.7 ± 12.2%) as well as normal lymph nodes (2.4 ± 0.8 mg/ml and 24.1 ± 10.8%) (P ≤ 0.013). An iodine concentration of 2.0 mg/ml represented the optimal threshold to discriminate between lymphoma and lymph node metastasis (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 89%). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between iodine concentration and fat fraction for both lymphomas and lymph node metastases (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: DECT enables characterization of abdominal masses as derived iodine and fat fraction values differ significantly between malignant abdominal lymphomas and lymph node metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 59 patients (39 men; mean age, 62.7 years) with histopathologically-confirmed diagnosis of either malignant lymphoma or lymph node metastasis were included. For each lesion, contrast-enhanced attenuation, as well as DECT-derived iodine density and fat fraction measurements were recorded. Mean attenuation and material density values were compared between malignant lymphomas and lymph node metastases. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was adopted to estimate the optimal threshold for discriminating between both entities. A control group (n = 60) was analyzed for comparison of attenuation and material density values of normal abdominal lymph nodes.
RESULTS: Assessment of DECT-derived iodine density and fat fraction values revealed significant differences between lymph node metastases (1.7 ± 0.4 mg/ml and 15.5 ± 7.3%) and malignant lymphomas (2.5 ± 0.5 mg/ml and 26.7 ± 12.2%) as well as normal lymph nodes (2.4 ± 0.8 mg/ml and 24.1 ± 10.8%) (P ≤ 0.013). An iodine concentration of 2.0 mg/ml represented the optimal threshold to discriminate between lymphoma and lymph node metastasis (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 89%). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between iodine concentration and fat fraction for both lymphomas and lymph node metastases (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: DECT enables characterization of abdominal masses as derived iodine and fat fraction values differ significantly between malignant abdominal lymphomas and lymph node metastases.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app