We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pediatric Neurodevelopmental Functioning After In Utero Exposure to Triple-NRTI vs. Dual-NRTI + PI ART in a Randomized Trial, Botswana.
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes : JAIDS 2018 November 2
BACKGROUND: In utero exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-containing antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens may be associated with poor neurodevelopmental functioning in children of HIV-infected mothers. We investigated neurodevelopmental outcomes of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) children of HIV-infected women enrolled in a randomized trial of abacavir/zidovudine/lamivudine (triple-NRTI regimen) vs. lopinavir/ritonavir/zidovudine/lamivudine [dual-NRTI + protease inhibitor (PI) regimen].
SETTING: The Mma Bana randomized trial was conducted in urban and rural sites in Botswana.
METHODS: The Mma Bana study randomized HIV-infected pregnant women with CD4 ≥200 cells per mm to a triple-NRTI vs. dual-NRTI + PI regimen from 26- to 34-week gestation through planned weaning at 6-month postpartum. Partway through the study, neurodevelopmental assessments were added at 24 months of age, including the Developmental Milestones Checklist, the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development third edition, Ten Questions Questionnaire, and Profile of Social Emotional Development. We evaluated differences in mean scores between the 2 arms using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression.
RESULTS: A total of 197 HEU infants (48% male) completed a neurodevelopmental assessment (101 in triple-NRTI arm and 96 in dual-NRTI + PI-exposed arm). Mean values for all neurodevelopmental outcomes were similar for children of mothers randomized to either ART regimen, with no significant differences in either unadjusted or adjusted models (estimated effect sizes ranging from -0.12 to 0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Neurodevelopmental outcomes in 24-month-old HEU children of HIV-infected mothers with baseline CD4 ≥200 were similar in those randomized to a dual-NRTI + PI-based vs. a triple-NRTI-based ART regimen, suggestive of lack of short-term toxicity. Monitoring of long-term toxicity and newer regimens is warranted.
SETTING: The Mma Bana randomized trial was conducted in urban and rural sites in Botswana.
METHODS: The Mma Bana study randomized HIV-infected pregnant women with CD4 ≥200 cells per mm to a triple-NRTI vs. dual-NRTI + PI regimen from 26- to 34-week gestation through planned weaning at 6-month postpartum. Partway through the study, neurodevelopmental assessments were added at 24 months of age, including the Developmental Milestones Checklist, the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development third edition, Ten Questions Questionnaire, and Profile of Social Emotional Development. We evaluated differences in mean scores between the 2 arms using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression.
RESULTS: A total of 197 HEU infants (48% male) completed a neurodevelopmental assessment (101 in triple-NRTI arm and 96 in dual-NRTI + PI-exposed arm). Mean values for all neurodevelopmental outcomes were similar for children of mothers randomized to either ART regimen, with no significant differences in either unadjusted or adjusted models (estimated effect sizes ranging from -0.12 to 0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Neurodevelopmental outcomes in 24-month-old HEU children of HIV-infected mothers with baseline CD4 ≥200 were similar in those randomized to a dual-NRTI + PI-based vs. a triple-NRTI-based ART regimen, suggestive of lack of short-term toxicity. Monitoring of long-term toxicity and newer regimens is warranted.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app