We have located links that may give you full text access.
Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in an elderly Indian population.
Ophthalmic Epidemiology 2018 July 18
PURPOSE: To study optic nerve head (ONH) characteristics using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT), in an elderly population.
METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional study included 1460 eyes of 1460 consecutive, subjects >60 years, in North India. All subjects underwent a detailed ophthalmic evaluation and imaged on HRT. Stereometric parameters, Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) and discriminant function analysis were analyzed. Correlation between ONH parameters and disc area, age, sex, and intraocular pressure was analyzed.
RESULTS: Disc size had a normal Gaussian distribution (2.22 ± 0.48 mm2 ), but all other stereometric parameters showed a wide variation. MRA found 1320 (90.4%) eyes within normal limits, 71 (4.86%), borderline limits, and 69 (4.73%) outside normal limits. Comparison of eyes meeting International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria for a glaucoma suspect, C:D > 0.7, with those that did not show a statistically significant difference in the cup area, rim area, rim disc ratio, and cup volume (p = 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 0.03, respectively). An Intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥21 mmHg was seen in 3.01%, and only 12 eyes out of 1460, 0.82%, had an IOP ≥21 mmHg and a cup:disc ratio of more than 0.7. A van Herick estimation of < Grade 3 was seen in 19.4% Conclusions: Stereometric parameter data, MRA, and clinical examination in this population at high risk for glaucoma found that about 10% of individuals over 60 years of age could be classified as glaucoma suspects and would need further evaluation.
METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional study included 1460 eyes of 1460 consecutive, subjects >60 years, in North India. All subjects underwent a detailed ophthalmic evaluation and imaged on HRT. Stereometric parameters, Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) and discriminant function analysis were analyzed. Correlation between ONH parameters and disc area, age, sex, and intraocular pressure was analyzed.
RESULTS: Disc size had a normal Gaussian distribution (2.22 ± 0.48 mm2 ), but all other stereometric parameters showed a wide variation. MRA found 1320 (90.4%) eyes within normal limits, 71 (4.86%), borderline limits, and 69 (4.73%) outside normal limits. Comparison of eyes meeting International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria for a glaucoma suspect, C:D > 0.7, with those that did not show a statistically significant difference in the cup area, rim area, rim disc ratio, and cup volume (p = 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 0.03, respectively). An Intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥21 mmHg was seen in 3.01%, and only 12 eyes out of 1460, 0.82%, had an IOP ≥21 mmHg and a cup:disc ratio of more than 0.7. A van Herick estimation of < Grade 3 was seen in 19.4% Conclusions: Stereometric parameter data, MRA, and clinical examination in this population at high risk for glaucoma found that about 10% of individuals over 60 years of age could be classified as glaucoma suspects and would need further evaluation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app