We have located links that may give you full text access.
Does abdominal ultrasound is a useful tool in appendicitis diagnosis?
Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny 2018 May 17
INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal illness. Despite diagnosis progress there is still 20% negative appendectomy rate. The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of abdominal sonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 326 patients who were operated with suspected appendicitis and had abdominal ultrasound before surgery. Appendicitis was confirmed by pathologic reports. There were two variants of positive abdominal sonography. In the first variant, the positive ultrasound was visualized inflamed appendix. In the second variant, the sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis was based on visualized inflamed appendix or one of indirect signs of appendicitis - localized periappendiceal fluid collection, enlarged lymph nodes, thickening of intestinal wall in right iliac fossa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were defined and compared.
RESULTS: 83,74% patients has appendicitis in pathologic report. In 39,53% cases appendix was visualized in abdominal ultrasound. In 65,95% cases of sonography indirect signs occurred. In the first variant sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 47,99%, 79,25%, 92,25% and 22,83%. In the second variant 67,77%, 43,40%, 86,05% and 20,72%. In the second variant sensitivity was significantly higher (p<0,001) but specificity was significantly lower (p<0,001).
CONCLUSION: Limited sensitivity and specificity cannot confirm appendicitis. Typical clinical course with negative ultrasound should not delay the correct diagnosis and early surgical treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 326 patients who were operated with suspected appendicitis and had abdominal ultrasound before surgery. Appendicitis was confirmed by pathologic reports. There were two variants of positive abdominal sonography. In the first variant, the positive ultrasound was visualized inflamed appendix. In the second variant, the sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis was based on visualized inflamed appendix or one of indirect signs of appendicitis - localized periappendiceal fluid collection, enlarged lymph nodes, thickening of intestinal wall in right iliac fossa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were defined and compared.
RESULTS: 83,74% patients has appendicitis in pathologic report. In 39,53% cases appendix was visualized in abdominal ultrasound. In 65,95% cases of sonography indirect signs occurred. In the first variant sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 47,99%, 79,25%, 92,25% and 22,83%. In the second variant 67,77%, 43,40%, 86,05% and 20,72%. In the second variant sensitivity was significantly higher (p<0,001) but specificity was significantly lower (p<0,001).
CONCLUSION: Limited sensitivity and specificity cannot confirm appendicitis. Typical clinical course with negative ultrasound should not delay the correct diagnosis and early surgical treatment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app