We have located links that may give you full text access.
Historical Article
Journal Article
Clinical characteristics and analysis of treatment result in children with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Poland between 2005 and 2017.
European Journal of Haematology 2018 October
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical characteristics and outcome of children diagnosed with Ph+ ALL.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 2591 newly diagnosed ALL children were treated in Poland between the years 2005 and 2017. Of those, 44 were diagnosed with Ph(+) ALL. The patients were treated according to protocols: ALL IC-BFM 2002 and 2009 (26 patients), EsPhALL (12 patients), initially ALL IC-BFM and then EsPhALL (6 patients).
RESULTS: The median of follow-up in the observed group was 3 years. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of Ph+ ALL group were 0.73 and 0.64. OS and EFS of patients after HSCT were 0.78 and 0.66, while without HSCT were 0.6 and 0.6, P = 0.27 and 0.63. OS was 0.8 for patients treated with chemotherapy plus imatinib and 0.61 for chemotherapy alone, P = 0.22, while EFS was 0.66 (imatinib therapy) and 0. 61 (without imatinib), P = 0.41.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that adding imatinib to intensive chemotherapy seems to improve outcome. However, this study was limited by a small number of patients and a variety of chemotherapy regimens with or without imatinib.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 2591 newly diagnosed ALL children were treated in Poland between the years 2005 and 2017. Of those, 44 were diagnosed with Ph(+) ALL. The patients were treated according to protocols: ALL IC-BFM 2002 and 2009 (26 patients), EsPhALL (12 patients), initially ALL IC-BFM and then EsPhALL (6 patients).
RESULTS: The median of follow-up in the observed group was 3 years. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of Ph+ ALL group were 0.73 and 0.64. OS and EFS of patients after HSCT were 0.78 and 0.66, while without HSCT were 0.6 and 0.6, P = 0.27 and 0.63. OS was 0.8 for patients treated with chemotherapy plus imatinib and 0.61 for chemotherapy alone, P = 0.22, while EFS was 0.66 (imatinib therapy) and 0. 61 (without imatinib), P = 0.41.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that adding imatinib to intensive chemotherapy seems to improve outcome. However, this study was limited by a small number of patients and a variety of chemotherapy regimens with or without imatinib.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app