We have located links that may give you full text access.
Quantification of skin stiffness in patients with systemic sclerosis using real-time shear wave elastography: a preliminary study.
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2018 July
OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) quantification in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and healthy controls.
METHODS: Skin elastic modulus (E) values and thicknesses were measured at 6 skin sites between the SSc (n=37) and control (n=37) groups. Thickness and E values were converted into T- and E-scores, to allow skin thickness and stiffness of different regions to be quantified based on a single standard. T- and E-scores were compared with the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS).
RESULTS: E values were significantly higher in SSc patients than healthy controls at all measured sites (p<0.001), whereas skin thickness increased significantly only at fingers and forearms (p<0.001). E-score analysis revealed mRSS differences within 1.0 at most sites, while T- score evaluation only showed differences between mRSS 0 and mRSS 1 at fingers. Interestingly, mRSS correlated more closely with skin stiffness (r=0.889, p<0.001) than skin thickness (r=0.465, p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SSc, SWE is more sensitive to detect subtle skin changes than B-mode ultrasound (US), and reflect the degree of skin involvement. As a non-invasive and operator-independent technique, SWE may provide a new and valuable method to evaluate the degree and changes of skin involvement in SSc patients.
METHODS: Skin elastic modulus (E) values and thicknesses were measured at 6 skin sites between the SSc (n=37) and control (n=37) groups. Thickness and E values were converted into T- and E-scores, to allow skin thickness and stiffness of different regions to be quantified based on a single standard. T- and E-scores were compared with the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS).
RESULTS: E values were significantly higher in SSc patients than healthy controls at all measured sites (p<0.001), whereas skin thickness increased significantly only at fingers and forearms (p<0.001). E-score analysis revealed mRSS differences within 1.0 at most sites, while T- score evaluation only showed differences between mRSS 0 and mRSS 1 at fingers. Interestingly, mRSS correlated more closely with skin stiffness (r=0.889, p<0.001) than skin thickness (r=0.465, p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SSc, SWE is more sensitive to detect subtle skin changes than B-mode ultrasound (US), and reflect the degree of skin involvement. As a non-invasive and operator-independent technique, SWE may provide a new and valuable method to evaluate the degree and changes of skin involvement in SSc patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app