We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Medicine (Baltimore) 2018 July
To compare the characteristics of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve (MTC) in patients with Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and differences in fulcrum-bending flexibility, correction rate, and correction index between different segments.Included in this study were 40 consecutive patients with Lenke 1 AIS who received posterior correction and fusion with pedicle screws. Cobb angle based on the proximal (T5-T7 or T6-T8), apical (T7-T9 or T8-T10), and distal (T9-T11 or T10-T12) segments in the fulcrum-bending position was measured before and after surgery. The flexibility ([Cobb angle of each segment - residual Cobb angle on fulcrum bending]/Cobb angle of each segment × 100%), correction rate ([Cobb angle of each segment - postoperative residual Cobb angle]/Cobb angle of each segment × 100%]), and correction index (correction rate of each segment/preoperative flexibility of each segment) in different segments were calculated. Comparative analyses were conducted by variance analysis.The mean age before surgery, Cobb angle, Risser sign, and follow-up time were 14.15 ± 2.13 years, 51.17 ± 10.72°, 2.78 ± 1.73, and 43.75 ± 9.82 months, respectively. MTC Cobb angle of the proximal segments was similar to that of the distal ones (12.88 ± 4.81 vs 12.85 ± 5.00) versus 25.45 ± 5.90 in the middle segments (P < .001). The flexibility was higher in the distal segments than that in the proximal or apical segments (66.43 ± 0.22% vs 43.78 ± 0.20% or 32.55 ± 0.17%, P < .001). One week after surgery, the correction rate in these 3 segments was 69.55 ± 0.1%, 66.25 ± 0.17%, and 75.28 ± 0.16 (P = .067), and the correction index was 2.15 ± 1.78, 3.16 ± 3.60, and 1.53 ± 1.93 (P = .019); the correction rate during the 3-year follow-up period was 68.06 ± 0.19%, 69.98 ± 0.15%, and 73.29 ± 0.17 (P = .212); and the correction index was 2.12 ± 1.78, 3.20 ± 3.54, and 1.49 ± 1.93 (P = .012), respectively.The proximal, apical, and distal segments in Lenke 1 AIS accounted for about 25%, 50%, and 25% of MTC Cobb angle, respectively. The distal segments were found to be most flexible and the apical segments most rigid. The correction rate was similar between the proximal, apical, and distal segments, and the correction index in the apical segments was higher than that in the proximal and distal segments.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app