The Impact of a 72-hour Waiting Period on Women's Access to Abortion Care at a Hospital-Based Clinic in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND In 2015, North Carolina became the 5th state to pass legislation requiring women to undergo state-mandated counseling 72 hours prior to abortion. Whether this legislation has changed the timing of abortion decision-making or receipt of care is not known. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study using anonymous survey data from women presenting for abortion at a hospital-based abortion clinic in North Carolina. Data were collected for 8 weeks immediately before and after implementation of the new waiting period. RESULTS 26/48 (54%) of eligible patients participated. More than half (56%) of women made their abortion decision relatively quickly (less than or equal to 3 days), but had a median time-to-care of almost a week. LIMITATIONS This small study is the 1st recent evaluation of abortion decision-making and receipt of care immediately before and after implementation of a 72-hour waiting period in a Southern state. Only women presenting for care at a single hospital-based clinic were surveyed. Data were self-reported. CONCLUSION In our clinical setting, most women decided to have an abortion quickly but still waited 10-15 days before receiving care. Extended waiting periods provide no medical benefits and the potential for harm and delay of care remains.