We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of OMNIgene ® •SPUTUM reagent for mycobacterial culture.
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2018 August 2
SETTING: National Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory, Borstel, Germany.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of OMNIgene®•SPUTUM (OM-S) reagent in comparison with a method using N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide (NALC-NaOH) with regard to mycobacterial recovery and contamination of broth and solid cultures.
DESIGN: Sputum samples from patients with tuberculosis and other respiratory diseases underwent decontamination with NALC-NaOH-based (MycoDDR™) or OM-S reagent. The decontamination procedure was assigned by block randomisation. Samples were inoculated on Löwenstein-Jensen, Stonebrink and MGIT™ (Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tubes). Mycobacterial recovery from samples spiked with Mycobacterium tuberculosis following decontamination was determined.
RESULTS: Eighty-five samples were randomised to NALC-NaOH and 84 to OM-S reagent. Mycobacterial recovery was significantly lower for samples processed with OM-S reagent compared with the NALC-NaOH method across all media types. Culture contamination was lower with NALC-NaOH reagent on solid media (9.4-12.9% vs. 28.6-29.8%). Growth was not observed in MGIT among samples spiked with 10 600-16 800 colony-forming units of M. tuberculosis following decontamination with OM-S reagent.
CONCLUSION: Low mycobacterial recovery, especially in MGIT, observed in the present study suggests that OM-S reagent might not be compatible with the MGIT system. More extensive field evaluations of the OM-S reagent are warranted to demonstrate a significant benefit over currently used methods.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of OMNIgene®•SPUTUM (OM-S) reagent in comparison with a method using N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide (NALC-NaOH) with regard to mycobacterial recovery and contamination of broth and solid cultures.
DESIGN: Sputum samples from patients with tuberculosis and other respiratory diseases underwent decontamination with NALC-NaOH-based (MycoDDR™) or OM-S reagent. The decontamination procedure was assigned by block randomisation. Samples were inoculated on Löwenstein-Jensen, Stonebrink and MGIT™ (Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tubes). Mycobacterial recovery from samples spiked with Mycobacterium tuberculosis following decontamination was determined.
RESULTS: Eighty-five samples were randomised to NALC-NaOH and 84 to OM-S reagent. Mycobacterial recovery was significantly lower for samples processed with OM-S reagent compared with the NALC-NaOH method across all media types. Culture contamination was lower with NALC-NaOH reagent on solid media (9.4-12.9% vs. 28.6-29.8%). Growth was not observed in MGIT among samples spiked with 10 600-16 800 colony-forming units of M. tuberculosis following decontamination with OM-S reagent.
CONCLUSION: Low mycobacterial recovery, especially in MGIT, observed in the present study suggests that OM-S reagent might not be compatible with the MGIT system. More extensive field evaluations of the OM-S reagent are warranted to demonstrate a significant benefit over currently used methods.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app