Monitoring collegiate soccer players during a congested match schedule: Heart rate variability versus subjective wellness measures.

The aims of this study were a) to examine within-group changes of wellness and heart rate variability measures and b) to compare their sensitivity to a congested match schedule in collegiate soccer players (n = 8). Wellness (Hooper index and its subsets) and heart rate variability (Ln rMSSD, SDNN) measures were assessed after selected low-load (training sessions) and high-load (a congested match schedule) phases. Session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) was computed for training and match sessions. A very likely large difference in accumulated sRPE was observed between low-load and high-load phases (+148.4%, 90% confidence interval CI [87.3; 229.5%]); effect size, ES, 2.16 [1.49; 2.82]. While the Hooper index showed an almost certainly moderate increase (+49.8%, [33.9; 67.5%]), ES, 1.05 [0.76; 1.34], heart rate variability measures (i.e., Ln rMSSD and SDNN) only changed with a possible trivial effect (range -2.1; 8.2%, [-7.1; 16.7%]), ES, -0.15; 0.15 [-0.50; 0.44]. The Hooper index showed a moderately higher sensitivity than Ln rMSSD to a congested match schedule (34.7%, [26.9; 41.6%], ES, 0.81 [0.60; 1.03]). Relationships between changes in the Hooper index and some of its subsets (∆Hooper index, ∆sleep, and ∆fatigue), with changes in mean sRPE (∆sRPE) were very large (range r = 0.72; 0.89). However, small associations were observed between changes in heart rate variability (∆Ln rMSSD, and ∆SDNN) and ∆sRPE (range r = -0.21; 0.10). This study suggests the use of subjective wellness indices, instead of heart rate variability measures, to monitor collegiate soccer players during congested match schedules.