We have located links that may give you full text access.
Advanced Multimodal Methods for Cranial Pseudo-CT Generation Validated by IMRT and VMAT Radiation Therapy Plans.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2018 November 16
PURPOSE: To investigate advanced multimodal methods for pseudo-computed tomography (CT) generation from standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences and to validate the results by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. We present 2 novel methods that employ key techniques to enhance pseudo-CTs and investigate the effect on image quality and applicability for IMRT and VMAT planning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data set contains CT and magnetic resonance image scans from 15 patients who underwent cranial radiation therapy. For each patient, pseudo-CTs of the head were generated with a patch-based and a voxel-based algorithm. The accuracy of the pseudo-CTs in comparison to clinical CTs was evaluated by mean absolute error, bias, and the Dice coefficient (of bone). IMRT and VMAT plans were created for each patient. Dose distributions were calculated with both the pseudo-CT and the clinical CT scans and compared by gamma tests, dose-volume histograms, and isocenter doses.
RESULTS: The generated pseudo-CTs exhibited average mean absolute errors of 118.7 ± 10.4 HU for the voxel-based algorithm and 73.0 ± 6.4 HU for the patch-based algorithm. The dose calculations were in good agreement and showed gamma test (2 mm, 2%) pass rates for both beam setups (IMRT and VMAT) of over 99% for 14 patients and over 98% for 1 patient.
CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the key techniques of our 2 novel algorithms advance the quality of pseudo-CT significantly and generate very competitive pseudo-CTs compared with previously published methods. This quality was confirmed by low dose error in comparison to the ground-truth CT. With the achieved level of accuracy, our patch-based algorithm especially is a candidate for clinical routine use in IMRT and VMAT planning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data set contains CT and magnetic resonance image scans from 15 patients who underwent cranial radiation therapy. For each patient, pseudo-CTs of the head were generated with a patch-based and a voxel-based algorithm. The accuracy of the pseudo-CTs in comparison to clinical CTs was evaluated by mean absolute error, bias, and the Dice coefficient (of bone). IMRT and VMAT plans were created for each patient. Dose distributions were calculated with both the pseudo-CT and the clinical CT scans and compared by gamma tests, dose-volume histograms, and isocenter doses.
RESULTS: The generated pseudo-CTs exhibited average mean absolute errors of 118.7 ± 10.4 HU for the voxel-based algorithm and 73.0 ± 6.4 HU for the patch-based algorithm. The dose calculations were in good agreement and showed gamma test (2 mm, 2%) pass rates for both beam setups (IMRT and VMAT) of over 99% for 14 patients and over 98% for 1 patient.
CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the key techniques of our 2 novel algorithms advance the quality of pseudo-CT significantly and generate very competitive pseudo-CTs compared with previously published methods. This quality was confirmed by low dose error in comparison to the ground-truth CT. With the achieved level of accuracy, our patch-based algorithm especially is a candidate for clinical routine use in IMRT and VMAT planning.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app