Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Early cirrhosis and a preserved bone marrow niche favour regenerative response to growth factors in decompensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Exogenous growth factor-mobilized bone marrow (BM) stem cells have shown a differential response in the management of decompensated cirrhosis (DC). This study was designed to evaluate potential clinical benefit of adding Erythropoietin (EPO) in granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized stem cell therapy, possible mechanisms of regeneration and predictive factors of regenerative response.

METHODS: Sixty consecutive DC patients received either G-CSF with EPO (Group A; n = 30) or G-CSF and placebo (Group B; n = 30) for 2 months and were carefully followed up for 1 year. Baseline and post-treatment liver biopsy, BM biopsy and BM aspirate were analysed for fibro-inflammatory and regenerative response and BM hematopoietic reservoir.

RESULTS: Addition of EPO to G-CSF showed a significant improvement in Child-Pugh score (P = 0.03) and MELD score (P = 0.003) as compared to G-CSF alone, with reduction in mortality (16.6% vs 36.7%, P = 0.09). The combination arm also demonstrated a decreased incidence of acute kidney injury (P < 0.001), encephalopathy (P = 0.005) and refilling of ascites (P = 0.03). Compared to monotherapy, it increased CD163+ macrophages (P = 0.013), Ki67+ index (P < 0.001) with decrease in α-SMA levels (P < 0.001) in liver tissue. The response was better with grade 1 and 2 than with grade 3 ascites; Child B cirrhosis and MELD < 16. Non-responders had lower hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) at baseline. On multivariate analysis, the liver disease severity (MELD < 16) and a relatively preserved BM (BM-HSCs > 0.4) predicted therapeutic response (AUROC = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS: Early DC (MELD < 16) patients with mild-moderate ascites and those with a healthy cellular baseline BM respond better to growth factor therapy. Addition of EPO to G-CSF provides better regenerative response than G-CSF monotherapy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app