We have located links that may give you full text access.
Recovering sexual satisfaction after prolapse surgery: a secondary analysis of surgical recovery.
International Urogynecology Journal 2018 November
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared pre- and postoperative sexual function scores in sexually active women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.
METHODS: Planned secondary analysis of women enrolled in the Restricted Convalescence: Outcomes Following Urogynecologic Procedures study, a randomized trial of postoperative activity after POP surgery. All participants could return to sexual activity at 6 weeks. Participants completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) profile, and the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) questionnaires at baseline and 3 months. GRISS is a validated 28-item survey for heterosexual couples that contains seven subscales to assess sexual function. Higher scores represent worse sexual function.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven sexually active women were assessed. Mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 56 ± 11, most of whom (92%) were Caucasian; 78% had undergone minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, and the remainder had native tissue vaginal repairs. GRISS scores improved 3 months after surgery [4.5 ± 2.6 to 3.6 ± 2.2, p < 0.001; mean decrease of 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-1.36]. PFDI scores improved from 122 ± 53 at baseline to 28 ± 31 at 3 months (p < 0.001). Higher GRISS scores were correlated with higher PFDI scores (Spearman's rho = 0.35, p = 0.03) at baseline and 3 months (Spearman's rho = 0.31, p = 0.03). Several GRISS subscales improved after surgery: partner avoidance (p = 0.01), vaginismus (p = 0.02), noncommunication (p = 0.01), dissatisfaction (p = 0.03), and anorgasmia (p = 0.001). However, sexual infrequency (p = 0.08) and nonsensuality (p = 0.4) did not change. Fifty-one percent had sexual dysfunction before surgery, which decreased to 32% after surgery (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Sexual function and satisfaction are significantly improved 3 months following POP surgery. Improved sexual function is correlated with improved pelvic floor symptoms.
METHODS: Planned secondary analysis of women enrolled in the Restricted Convalescence: Outcomes Following Urogynecologic Procedures study, a randomized trial of postoperative activity after POP surgery. All participants could return to sexual activity at 6 weeks. Participants completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) profile, and the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) questionnaires at baseline and 3 months. GRISS is a validated 28-item survey for heterosexual couples that contains seven subscales to assess sexual function. Higher scores represent worse sexual function.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven sexually active women were assessed. Mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 56 ± 11, most of whom (92%) were Caucasian; 78% had undergone minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, and the remainder had native tissue vaginal repairs. GRISS scores improved 3 months after surgery [4.5 ± 2.6 to 3.6 ± 2.2, p < 0.001; mean decrease of 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-1.36]. PFDI scores improved from 122 ± 53 at baseline to 28 ± 31 at 3 months (p < 0.001). Higher GRISS scores were correlated with higher PFDI scores (Spearman's rho = 0.35, p = 0.03) at baseline and 3 months (Spearman's rho = 0.31, p = 0.03). Several GRISS subscales improved after surgery: partner avoidance (p = 0.01), vaginismus (p = 0.02), noncommunication (p = 0.01), dissatisfaction (p = 0.03), and anorgasmia (p = 0.001). However, sexual infrequency (p = 0.08) and nonsensuality (p = 0.4) did not change. Fifty-one percent had sexual dysfunction before surgery, which decreased to 32% after surgery (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Sexual function and satisfaction are significantly improved 3 months following POP surgery. Improved sexual function is correlated with improved pelvic floor symptoms.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app