We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Outcome of Endoscopic Management of Post Living Donor Liver Transplant Anastomotic Strictures.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic dilatation of anastomotic stricture (AS).
STUDY DESIGN: An observational study.
PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan from November 2016 to November 2017.
METHODOLOGY: Patients presenting with anastomotic biliary stricture following living donor liver transplant (LDLT) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP) and treatment of their strictures with dilatation with or without stenting. The patients were then followed up to see adequate resolution of stricture and repeat therapeutic ERCP was performed, if required. The patients were labelled as cured if stricture resolution persisted for a period of up to six months following ERCP.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients (32 males and 11 females), with post-LDLT AS, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Thirty-six (83.7%) patients had a single biliary anastomosis while seven (16.3%) patients had two anastomoses. Ductoplasty was done in 15 (34.9%) of the enrolled patients. Patients with post-LDLT AS required 3.65 +1.15 sessions of ERCP. Plastic type biliary stent was used in seven (16.3%) patients, balloon dilatation alone was done in five (11.6%) patients and combined balloon dilatation and stent placement was performed in 29 (67.4%) patients, and combined graduated dilator and stent placement was performed in two (4.7%) patients. Five (11.6%) patients required rendezvous procedure (whereby a radiologist placed a guidewire percutaneously into the biliary system) as guidewire placement across stricture site was endoscopically unsuccessful. The overall success rate was 88.4%. Mean stent free follow-up was 7.18 +1.38 months. Recurrence of AS was noted in one (2.3%) patient.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic management of post-LDLT AS has an efficacious long-term outcome.
STUDY DESIGN: An observational study.
PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan from November 2016 to November 2017.
METHODOLOGY: Patients presenting with anastomotic biliary stricture following living donor liver transplant (LDLT) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP) and treatment of their strictures with dilatation with or without stenting. The patients were then followed up to see adequate resolution of stricture and repeat therapeutic ERCP was performed, if required. The patients were labelled as cured if stricture resolution persisted for a period of up to six months following ERCP.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients (32 males and 11 females), with post-LDLT AS, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Thirty-six (83.7%) patients had a single biliary anastomosis while seven (16.3%) patients had two anastomoses. Ductoplasty was done in 15 (34.9%) of the enrolled patients. Patients with post-LDLT AS required 3.65 +1.15 sessions of ERCP. Plastic type biliary stent was used in seven (16.3%) patients, balloon dilatation alone was done in five (11.6%) patients and combined balloon dilatation and stent placement was performed in 29 (67.4%) patients, and combined graduated dilator and stent placement was performed in two (4.7%) patients. Five (11.6%) patients required rendezvous procedure (whereby a radiologist placed a guidewire percutaneously into the biliary system) as guidewire placement across stricture site was endoscopically unsuccessful. The overall success rate was 88.4%. Mean stent free follow-up was 7.18 +1.38 months. Recurrence of AS was noted in one (2.3%) patient.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic management of post-LDLT AS has an efficacious long-term outcome.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app