We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography in Assessment of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Fabry Disease.
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2018 August
BACKGROUND: Cardiac hypertrophy in Fabry disease can be assessed using the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) with either echocardiography (LVMI-ECHO) or magnetic resonance imaging (LVMI-CMR).
METHODS: A retrospective case series of patients with Fabry disease in Alberta involved a cross-sectional analysis of 32 patients and a longitudinal analysis of 14 of these patients with at least 4 serial CMR measurements.
RESULTS: The cross-sectional analysis showed the mean LVMI-ECHO was 97.8 ± 26.0 g/m2 , which was higher compared with LVMI-CMR at 81.1 ± 26.9 g/m2 with a mean bias of 16.7 g/m2 (P < 0.001). In the longitudinal analysis, LVMI-ECHO was higher, with an estimated marginal mean of 96.21 ± 6.13 (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]) compared with 71.18 ± 5.99 for LVMI-CMR (P < 0.01; generalized estimating equations). There was an association between an increase in LVMI-CMR over time with the presence of cardiac fibrosis, and patients treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) had slower increases than those without therapy. LVMI-ECHO failed to detect these associations owing to the higher variability and tendency to overestimate the LVMI.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose the preferred method for measuring LVMI is CMR in patients with Fabry disease.
METHODS: A retrospective case series of patients with Fabry disease in Alberta involved a cross-sectional analysis of 32 patients and a longitudinal analysis of 14 of these patients with at least 4 serial CMR measurements.
RESULTS: The cross-sectional analysis showed the mean LVMI-ECHO was 97.8 ± 26.0 g/m2 , which was higher compared with LVMI-CMR at 81.1 ± 26.9 g/m2 with a mean bias of 16.7 g/m2 (P < 0.001). In the longitudinal analysis, LVMI-ECHO was higher, with an estimated marginal mean of 96.21 ± 6.13 (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]) compared with 71.18 ± 5.99 for LVMI-CMR (P < 0.01; generalized estimating equations). There was an association between an increase in LVMI-CMR over time with the presence of cardiac fibrosis, and patients treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) had slower increases than those without therapy. LVMI-ECHO failed to detect these associations owing to the higher variability and tendency to overestimate the LVMI.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose the preferred method for measuring LVMI is CMR in patients with Fabry disease.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app