Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Estimating the need for palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A criterion-based benchmarking approach.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Estimates of appropriate treatment rates are required for monitoring and improving access to cancer care. Optimal utilization rates for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain undefined. We aim to estimate the appropriate PRT rate for the general NSCLC population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ontario's population-based cancer registry identified patients with NSCLC who died of their disease between 2006 and 2010. Multivariate analysis identified factors affecting PRT use, enabling us to define a benchmark population with unimpeded access to PRT. Proportion of cases treated in the last 2 years of life (PRT2y ) was standardized to overall population characteristics. Benchmarks were compared to province-wide PRT2y rates.

RESULTS: Availability of RT at the diagnosing hospital was the dominant determinant of increased PRT utilization. Patients diagnosed at hospitals with on site RT were therefore designated the benchmark population. The standardized benchmark for PRT2y was 56%, compared to the province-wide rate of 49%. The gap between actual and optimal rates varied across patient ages, treatment indications, and geographic regions.

CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 56% of patients who die of NSCLC in Ontario need PRT, but many are never treated.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app