Propranolol versus steroids for the treatment of ulcerated infantile hemangiomas.

BACKGROUND: There has been a paradigm shift from steroids to propranolol for the pharmacologic treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IH); however, the outcomes for ulcerated IH are not well studied. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of steroids and propranolol specifically for ulcerated IH.

METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with ulcerated IH treated with propranolol or steroids at a single tertiary care institution between 2007 and 2014. Patient characteristics, hemangioma features, and outcomes, including time to heal and medication complications, were compared between propranolol and steroid patients.

RESULTS: There were 29 patients treated with propranolol and 23 with steroids. There were no significant differences in the two treatment groups including age, race, sex, size, or insurance status. There were more head/neck IH in the steroid group. There was no significant difference in the percentage of healed lesions (93 vs. 74%, P = 0.12) or the median time to heal (80 vs. 126 days, p = 0.21) between groups. Overall complication rates also did not vary between medications (24 vs. 44%, P = 0.14).

CONCLUSION: Propranolol is noninferior to steroids for the treatment of ulcerated IH; however, healing time is lengthy regardless of treatment. While side effect profiles differed between medications, the overall complication rate was similar.