Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Different concentrations of Edwardsiella tarda ghost vaccine induces immune responses in vivo and protects Sparus macrocephalus against a homologous challenge.

Bacterial ghosts (BGs) can be generated by the controlled expression of the PhiX174 lysis gene E in gram-negative bacteria. They are intriguing vaccine candidates since ghosts retain functional antigenic cellular determinants often lost during traditional inactivation procedures. Here we prepared Edwardsiella tarda ghost (ETG) and tested different concentrations in vaccination trials. The results showed that serum IgM antibody titers were significantly higher in three different concentration immunization groups than control group (P < 0.05), However, there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference between the immunized groups. The phagocytic percentage (PP) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in ETG immunized groups than in the control group from 3 days post-treatment. The PP continued to rise with time until day 21, when the values of three ETG immunized groups were 45.7%,51.2% and 50.7%, respectively. In addition, phagocytic index (PI) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in ETG immunized groups than in the control group after 7 days post-treatment. However, there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference of PP or PI between immunized groups. In addition, non-specific immune immunity, such as acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, superoxide dismutase and lysozyme activities displayed a similar pattern in all immunized groups, all immunized fish showed significantly higher activities than control group fish (P < 0.05). Most importantly three ETG immunized groups were all significantly more protected against the E. tarda challenge (19/25, 76% survival), (21/25, 84% survival) and (20/25, 80% survival) respectively, compared to (9/25, 36% survival) survival in the control group, but there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference of survival rate (SR) or relative percent survival (RPS) between immunized groups. All these results suggest that an ETG could stimulate cellular and humoral immunity, and could be used as a vaccine candidate in S.m. In summary, ETG can protect fish from Edwardsiellosis, and there is no significant difference in SR and RPS when three different concentrations of ETG are used, so it can easily be developed as a vaccine for mechanical and artificial operations.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app