Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Inotropic and lusitropic effects of levosimendan and milrinone assessed by strain echocardiography-A randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared the direct inotropic and lusitropic effects of two inodilators, milrinone and levosimendan in patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

METHODS: In this randomised, blinded study, 31 patients with normal LV function, were randomised to either levosimendan (0.1 and 0.2 μg/kg/min, n = 15) or milrinone (0.4 and 0.8 μg/kg/min, n = 16) after aortic valve replacement. The effects on LV performance, LV strain, systolic (SR-S) and early diastolic (SR-E) strain rate were assessed by a pulmonary artery catheter and transoesophageal two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography of the LV inferior wall. To circumvent the inodilator-induced hemodynamic changes on LV systolic and diastolic deformation, central venous pressure (CVP), systolic artery pressure (SAP), and heart rate were maintained constant by colloid infusion, phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and atrial pacing, respectively, during drug infusion.

RESULTS: Both inotropic agents induced a dose-dependent increase in cardiac index and stroke volume index by approximately 20% at the highest infusion rates with no differences between groups (P = .139 and .249, respectively). CVP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, SAP and heart rate were maintained constant in both groups. LV strain and SR-S increased with both agents, dose-dependently, by 17%-18% and 25%-30%, respectively, at the highest infusion rates, with no difference between groups (P = .434 and .284, respectively). Both agents improved early LV relaxation with no differences between groups (P = .637). At the higher doses, both agents increased SR-E by 30%.

CONCLUSIONS: At clinically relevant infusion rates and a certain increase in LV performance the direct inotropic and lusitropic of milrinone and levosimendan were comparable.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app