We have located links that may give you full text access.
In silico molecular interaction of bisphenol analogues with human nuclear receptors reveals their stronger affinity vs. classical bisphenol A.
Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 2018 November
BACKGROUND: Bisphenol A (BPA) is known for endocrine disrupting activity. In order to replace BPA, a number of bisphenol analogues have been designed. However, their activity profile is poorly described and little information exists about their endocrine disrupting potential and interactions with nuclear receptors. An understanding of such interaction may unravel mechanism of their molecular action and provide valuable inputs for risk assessment. BPA binds and activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs) which act as transcription factors and regulate genes involved in glucose, lipid, and cholesterol metabolism and adipogenesis.
METHODS: We studied binding efficiency of 18 bisphenol analogues and BPA with human PPARs and RXRs. Using Maestro Schrodinger 9.4, docking scores of bisphenols were compared with the known endogenous and exogenous ligands of hPPARs and hRXRs.
RESULTS: BPA showed good binding efficiency. Several analogues also showed higher binding efficiency than BPA. BPPH which has high tendency to be absorbed in tissues showed the strongest binding with hPPARα, hPPARβ, hPPARγ, and hRXRα whereas two of the most toxic bisphenols, BPM and BPAF showed strongest binding with hRXRβ and hRXRγ.
CONCLUSIONS: Some of the bisphenol analogues showed a stronger binding affinity with PPAR and RXR compared to BPA implying that BPA substitutes may not be fully safe and chemico-biological interactions indicate their toxic potential. These results may also serve to plan further studies for determining safety profile of bisphenol analogues and be helpful in risk characterization.
METHODS: We studied binding efficiency of 18 bisphenol analogues and BPA with human PPARs and RXRs. Using Maestro Schrodinger 9.4, docking scores of bisphenols were compared with the known endogenous and exogenous ligands of hPPARs and hRXRs.
RESULTS: BPA showed good binding efficiency. Several analogues also showed higher binding efficiency than BPA. BPPH which has high tendency to be absorbed in tissues showed the strongest binding with hPPARα, hPPARβ, hPPARγ, and hRXRα whereas two of the most toxic bisphenols, BPM and BPAF showed strongest binding with hRXRβ and hRXRγ.
CONCLUSIONS: Some of the bisphenol analogues showed a stronger binding affinity with PPAR and RXR compared to BPA implying that BPA substitutes may not be fully safe and chemico-biological interactions indicate their toxic potential. These results may also serve to plan further studies for determining safety profile of bisphenol analogues and be helpful in risk characterization.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app