We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reliability of Tidal Volume in Average Volume Assured Pressure Support Mode.
Respiratory Care 2018 September
BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring is increasingly used in patients who receive home mechanical ventilation. The average volume assured pressure support mode is a target volume pressure preset mode that delivers a given tidal volume (VT ) within a range of controlled inspiratory pressures. In a mode such as this, it is important to verify that the VT value retrieved from the ventilator SD card is accurate.
METHODS: A lung model was set with C (Compliance) 0.075 L/cm H2 O and RI (Inspiratory resistance)-RE (Expiratory resistance) 15-25 cm H2 O/L/s (model 1) or with C 0.050 L/cm H2 O and RI 6 cm H2 O/L/s (model 2) and 6 cm H2 O effort. Three home-care ventilators (A40, PrismaST30, and Vivo40) were set to average volume assured pressure support mode with 0.3 and 0.6 L VT each at PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2 O, and were connected to the lung model with and without nonintentional leak. The reference airway pressure and flow were measured by a data logger. VT was expressed in body temperature and pressure saturated. We assessed the difference in VT between the ventilator SD card and a data logger relative to set VT and factors associated with its magnitude.
RESULTS: For A40, PrismaST30, and Vivo40, the adjusted mean VT differences between the ventilator SD card and the data logger were -0.053 L (95% CI -0.067 to -0.039 L) ( P < .001), -0.002 L (95%CI -0.022 to 0.019 L) ( P = .86), and -0.067 L (95% CI -0.007 to 0.127 L) ( P = .03), respectively. The partial Spearman correlation coefficients between the ventilator SD card and a data logger were 0.89 ( P < .001), 0.59 ( P < .001), and 0.78 ( P < .001), respectively to the ventilators. The relative variations in measured VT from the set VT were 16.0, -12.0, and 6.7% for the ventilator SD card, and were -2.5, -7.5, and -27.2% for the data logger, respectively. The discrepancy in ventilator between SD card and data logger were influenced by PEEP for the PrismaST30 ventilator, nonintentional leak for the Vivo40 ventilator and PEEP, nonintentional leak, and underlying disease, the effect of each depending on the levels of the other factors, for the A40 ventilator.
CONCLUSIONS: In the 3 home-care ventilators, the ventilator SD card underestimated VT . Factors involved in this difference differed among the ventilators.
METHODS: A lung model was set with C (Compliance) 0.075 L/cm H2 O and RI (Inspiratory resistance)-RE (Expiratory resistance) 15-25 cm H2 O/L/s (model 1) or with C 0.050 L/cm H2 O and RI 6 cm H2 O/L/s (model 2) and 6 cm H2 O effort. Three home-care ventilators (A40, PrismaST30, and Vivo40) were set to average volume assured pressure support mode with 0.3 and 0.6 L VT each at PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2 O, and were connected to the lung model with and without nonintentional leak. The reference airway pressure and flow were measured by a data logger. VT was expressed in body temperature and pressure saturated. We assessed the difference in VT between the ventilator SD card and a data logger relative to set VT and factors associated with its magnitude.
RESULTS: For A40, PrismaST30, and Vivo40, the adjusted mean VT differences between the ventilator SD card and the data logger were -0.053 L (95% CI -0.067 to -0.039 L) ( P < .001), -0.002 L (95%CI -0.022 to 0.019 L) ( P = .86), and -0.067 L (95% CI -0.007 to 0.127 L) ( P = .03), respectively. The partial Spearman correlation coefficients between the ventilator SD card and a data logger were 0.89 ( P < .001), 0.59 ( P < .001), and 0.78 ( P < .001), respectively to the ventilators. The relative variations in measured VT from the set VT were 16.0, -12.0, and 6.7% for the ventilator SD card, and were -2.5, -7.5, and -27.2% for the data logger, respectively. The discrepancy in ventilator between SD card and data logger were influenced by PEEP for the PrismaST30 ventilator, nonintentional leak for the Vivo40 ventilator and PEEP, nonintentional leak, and underlying disease, the effect of each depending on the levels of the other factors, for the A40 ventilator.
CONCLUSIONS: In the 3 home-care ventilators, the ventilator SD card underestimated VT . Factors involved in this difference differed among the ventilators.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app