COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A cross-sectional study on factors associated with patient-physician discordance in global assessment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis: an Asian perspective.

AIM: To identify the factors associated with patient-physician discordance in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in an Asian population.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary referral centers in Singapore. Patients with axSpA who fulfilled Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group 2009 criteria for axSpA were included in the study. Socio-demographics, clinical, laboratory and patient-reported outcomes data were collected during study visits from 2014 to 2015. We performed univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate the factors associated with patient-physician discordance, which we defined as the difference between Patient Global Assessment and Physician Global Assessment.

RESULTS: Included in the study were 298 axSpA patients: 82% male, 81% Chinese, median age 40 (20-78) years, median disease duration 9 (0.1-48) years. 80% were on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 23% on biologics. In univariate analysis, current age (β: 0.18, ρ = 0.06), duration of disease (β: 0.34, ρ = 0.03), post-secondary education level (β: -10.82, ρ = 0.03), global pain score (β: 0.33, ρ < 0.01), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (β: 2.80, ρ < 0.01), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein (β: 4.63, ρ < 0.01) and current use of biologics (β: 10.97, ρ < 0.01) were associated with patient-physician discordance. In multivariate analysis, global pain score (β: 0.32, ρ < 0.01), post-secondary education level (β: -12.80, ρ = 0.01) and current biologics use (β: 16.21, ρ < 0.01) were associated with patient-physician discordance.

CONCLUSION: Higher global pain score, lower educational level and current biologics use were associated with greater patient-physician discordance. These factors should be considered during shared decision making.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app