COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical and Radiographic Results After Posterior Wedge Osteotomy for Thoracolumbar Kyphosis Secondary to Ankylosing Spondylitis: Comparison of Long and Short Segment.

World Neurosurgery 2018 September
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of long and short segment instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for thoracolumbar kyphosis caused by ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive AS patients were analyzed and divided into groups according to length of instrumentation. We defined short segment instrumentation (SSI) as construct length <7 levels (≤3 levels above and below the osteotomy) (n = 17). By contrast, long segment instrumentation (LSI) was defined as construct length ≥7 levels (≥4 levels above and ≥3 levels below the osteotomy) (n = 47). Both groups were matched cohorts. Radiographs were analyzed for correction, ossification, and complications.

RESULTS: Correction loss in global kyphosis (GK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) of the LSI group was slightly higher than that of SSI group. Notably, a significantly higher modified Stokes Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) was noted in the SSI group. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that thoracic and lumbar spine mSASSS were significantly associated with correction loss in GK and LL, respectively. Two cases of proximal junctional kyphosis and 1 case of rod fracture occurred in the LSI group.

CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches were able to maintain sustained surgical outcomes. Short segment instrumentation is recommended for AS patients with bridging syndesmophytes. Long constructs are better indicated for patients without fully ossified anterior longitudinal ligaments. Nevertheless, extension of the length of instrumentation might not prevent complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis or rod fracture in patients without fully ossified vertebrae.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app