We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Postponing Early intrauterine Transfusion with Intravenous immunoglobulin Treatment; the PETIT study on severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018 September
BACKGROUND: Intrauterine transfusion for severe alloimmunization in pregnancy performed <20 weeks' gestation is associated with a higher fetal death rate. Intravenous immunoglobulins may prevent hemolysis and could therefore be a noninvasive alternative for early transfusions.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether maternal treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins defers the development of severe fetal anemia and its consequences in a retrospective cohort to which 12 fetal therapy centers contributed.
STUDY DESIGN: We included consecutive pregnancies of alloimmunized women with a history of severe hemolytic disease and by propensity analysis compared index pregnancies treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 24) with pregnancies managed without intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 28).
RESULTS: In index pregnancies with intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, fetal anemia developed on average 15 days later compared to previous pregnancies (8% less often <20 weeks' gestation). In pregnancies without intravenous immunoglobulin treatment anemia developed 9 days earlier compared to previous pregnancies (10% more <20 weeks), an adjusted 4-day between-group difference in favor of the immunoglobulin group (95% confidence interval, -10 to +18; P = .564). In the subcohort in which immunoglobulin treatment was started <13 weeks, anemia developed 25 days later and 31% less <20 weeks' gestation (54% compared to 23%) than in the previous pregnancy. Fetal hydrops occurred in 4% of immunoglobulin-treated pregnancies and in 24% of those without intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (odds ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.5; P = .011). Exchange transfusions were given to 9% of neonates born from pregnancies with and in 37% without immunoglobulin treatment (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.5; P = .009).
CONCLUSION: Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in mothers pregnant with a fetus at risk for hemolytic disease seems to have a potential clinically relevant, beneficial effect on the course and severity of the disease. Confirmation in a multicenter randomized trial is needed.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether maternal treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins defers the development of severe fetal anemia and its consequences in a retrospective cohort to which 12 fetal therapy centers contributed.
STUDY DESIGN: We included consecutive pregnancies of alloimmunized women with a history of severe hemolytic disease and by propensity analysis compared index pregnancies treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 24) with pregnancies managed without intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 28).
RESULTS: In index pregnancies with intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, fetal anemia developed on average 15 days later compared to previous pregnancies (8% less often <20 weeks' gestation). In pregnancies without intravenous immunoglobulin treatment anemia developed 9 days earlier compared to previous pregnancies (10% more <20 weeks), an adjusted 4-day between-group difference in favor of the immunoglobulin group (95% confidence interval, -10 to +18; P = .564). In the subcohort in which immunoglobulin treatment was started <13 weeks, anemia developed 25 days later and 31% less <20 weeks' gestation (54% compared to 23%) than in the previous pregnancy. Fetal hydrops occurred in 4% of immunoglobulin-treated pregnancies and in 24% of those without intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (odds ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.5; P = .011). Exchange transfusions were given to 9% of neonates born from pregnancies with and in 37% without immunoglobulin treatment (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.5; P = .009).
CONCLUSION: Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in mothers pregnant with a fetus at risk for hemolytic disease seems to have a potential clinically relevant, beneficial effect on the course and severity of the disease. Confirmation in a multicenter randomized trial is needed.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app