We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Selecting candidates for pharmacy residencies: A national survey of residency program directors.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2018 December
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Due to advances in healthcare and treatment options, there is a need for pharmacists with additional post-graduate residency training. With the growing need for residency-trained pharmacists, obtaining a post-graduate pharmacy residency has become more competitive. The objective of this study was to capture the perspectives of post-graduate year 1 residency programme directors (RPDs) in the United States (US) regarding aspects of a candidate's application and interview they found most important when selecting future residents.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, electronic survey was distributed via e-mail to PGY-1 pharmacy RPDs in the USA. RPDs were identified via the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists' pharmacy residency directory. Data related to programme demographics, candidate applications and interview evaluations were collected. RPDs' perceptions were captured via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 327 (26.6%) RPDs completed the survey. RPDs highly considered overall compatibility (mean Likert score: 4.9), letters of recommendation (4.6) and letter of interest (4.5) when inviting candidates for on-site interviews. Residency programmes focusing in acute care valued hospital pharmacy work experience more compared to non-acute care-focused residency programmes (4.2 vs 2.9). During the interview, critical thinking ability (4.8), verbal communication (4.8) and overall compatibility (4.9) were viewed as highly important when considering ranking of candidates.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Due to the competitive nature of obtaining a residency programme, insight from RPDs on factors they consider significant when assessing prospective residents is valuable. The results from this study show that a strong letter of intent, letters of recommendations and overall compatibility are considered important by RPDs and should be used by candidates to better prepare themselves for residency applications. Additionally, the candidate should remain knowledgeable about the residency programme and be able to respond to questions asked during the residency interview process.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, electronic survey was distributed via e-mail to PGY-1 pharmacy RPDs in the USA. RPDs were identified via the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists' pharmacy residency directory. Data related to programme demographics, candidate applications and interview evaluations were collected. RPDs' perceptions were captured via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 327 (26.6%) RPDs completed the survey. RPDs highly considered overall compatibility (mean Likert score: 4.9), letters of recommendation (4.6) and letter of interest (4.5) when inviting candidates for on-site interviews. Residency programmes focusing in acute care valued hospital pharmacy work experience more compared to non-acute care-focused residency programmes (4.2 vs 2.9). During the interview, critical thinking ability (4.8), verbal communication (4.8) and overall compatibility (4.9) were viewed as highly important when considering ranking of candidates.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Due to the competitive nature of obtaining a residency programme, insight from RPDs on factors they consider significant when assessing prospective residents is valuable. The results from this study show that a strong letter of intent, letters of recommendations and overall compatibility are considered important by RPDs and should be used by candidates to better prepare themselves for residency applications. Additionally, the candidate should remain knowledgeable about the residency programme and be able to respond to questions asked during the residency interview process.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app