We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
Association of Body Mass Index and the Risk of New-Onset Diabetes After Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-analysis.
Transplantation Proceedings 2018 June
OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively examine the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation (NODAT).
METHODS: The electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, updated in December 2016, were searched, and a literature review was conducted as well to identify relevant research studies. With the use of R 3.12 software, the association between BMI and NODAT risk was analyzed by means of a meta-analysis, with the mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect indexes. Publication bias was assessed with the use of the Egger test. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding 1 study at a time. And the overall morbidity of NODAT was calculated.
RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, 55 eligible studies involving 15,458 kidney transplantation cases were included. After the heterogeneity test, the random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled results of the effect indexes. The results of the meta-analysis showed that BMI was an independent risk factor of NODAT (MD, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.48-2.27). No publication bias was found among the included studies (t = 0.3417; P = 0.7339). The sensitivity analysis revealed that the pooled MD did not reverse after ignoring 1 study at a time. In addition, the overall morbidity of NODAT was 21% (95% CI, 21%-23%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BMI is an independent risk factor for NODAT.
METHODS: The electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, updated in December 2016, were searched, and a literature review was conducted as well to identify relevant research studies. With the use of R 3.12 software, the association between BMI and NODAT risk was analyzed by means of a meta-analysis, with the mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect indexes. Publication bias was assessed with the use of the Egger test. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding 1 study at a time. And the overall morbidity of NODAT was calculated.
RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, 55 eligible studies involving 15,458 kidney transplantation cases were included. After the heterogeneity test, the random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled results of the effect indexes. The results of the meta-analysis showed that BMI was an independent risk factor of NODAT (MD, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.48-2.27). No publication bias was found among the included studies (t = 0.3417; P = 0.7339). The sensitivity analysis revealed that the pooled MD did not reverse after ignoring 1 study at a time. In addition, the overall morbidity of NODAT was 21% (95% CI, 21%-23%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BMI is an independent risk factor for NODAT.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app