We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Students' Perception of Peer and Faculty Debriefing Facilitators Following Simulation- Based Education.
CONTEXT: Debriefing (discussion led by a facilitator) in simulation-based education enhances dual learning for facilitators and students. Debriefing guides students to critically reflect on their performance in a simulation setting, thus allowing improvement in cognitive and clinical skills. Research has examined the effectiveness of simulation-based education on knowledge, skills, and confidence; however, less research has examined students' perception of debriefing.
OBJECTIVE: To compare peer- and faculty-facilitated debriefing on students' confidence and perceptions of simulation effectiveness.
METHODS: Pretest-posttest design, evaluating 23 first-year athletic training students in a CAATE-accredited professional master's program. Participants responded to a series of questions at pre- and posttest using the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) to evaluate participant self-confidence of select clinical skills and perceived effectiveness of debriefing.
RESULTS: Participants reported a significant increase from pretest to posttest in their confidence in making a differential diagnosis (F=4.26, p=0.03) and ability to share thoughts and emotions without fear of being shamed or humiliated (F=2.08, p=0.05).
CONCLUSION: Students perceived peer- and faculty-facilitated debriefing as equally effective. Peers may assume a facilitator role and provide an effective debriefing session following simulation.
OBJECTIVE: To compare peer- and faculty-facilitated debriefing on students' confidence and perceptions of simulation effectiveness.
METHODS: Pretest-posttest design, evaluating 23 first-year athletic training students in a CAATE-accredited professional master's program. Participants responded to a series of questions at pre- and posttest using the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) to evaluate participant self-confidence of select clinical skills and perceived effectiveness of debriefing.
RESULTS: Participants reported a significant increase from pretest to posttest in their confidence in making a differential diagnosis (F=4.26, p=0.03) and ability to share thoughts and emotions without fear of being shamed or humiliated (F=2.08, p=0.05).
CONCLUSION: Students perceived peer- and faculty-facilitated debriefing as equally effective. Peers may assume a facilitator role and provide an effective debriefing session following simulation.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app