We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Deciphering Endodontic Microbial Communities by Next-generation Sequencing.
Journal of Endodontics 2018 July
INTRODUCTION: Biofilms are present in more than 70% of endodontically diseased teeth. Through the advancements in the next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, microbiome research has granted a deeper analysis of the microbial communities living in human hosts. Here, we reviewed previous studies that used NGS to profile the microbial communities of root canals.
METHODS: A total of 12 peer-reviewed articles from PubMed were identified and critically reviewed. The study criteria were as follows: NGS platforms, sequenced bacterial hypervariable regions, teeth diagnosis with available patient information, sample characteristics, collection method, and microbial signatures.
RESULTS: The most common NGS platforms used were 454 pyrosequencing (Roche Diagnostic Corporation, Risch-Rotkreuz, Switzerland) and Illumina-based technology (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA). The hypervariable regions sequenced were between the V1 and V6 regions. The patient and sample population ranged from ages 12-76 years and asymptomatic and symptomatic teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis with or without apical periodontitis. Microbial sampling was conducted directly from the infected pulp or the extracted teeth. The most abundant phyla were Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria. The most frequently detected genera were Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Parvimonas, and Streptococcus. Other notable microbial signatures at different taxa levels were identified but were widely variable between studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Technologies based on high-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA NGS can aid in deciphering the complex bacterial communities of root canal biofilms. Thus far, only a few studies have been published with relatively small sample sizes, variable sample collection protocols, and community analyses methods. Future larger clinical studies are essential with validated standardized protocols for improved understanding of the pathogenic nature of bacterial biofilm communities in root canals.
METHODS: A total of 12 peer-reviewed articles from PubMed were identified and critically reviewed. The study criteria were as follows: NGS platforms, sequenced bacterial hypervariable regions, teeth diagnosis with available patient information, sample characteristics, collection method, and microbial signatures.
RESULTS: The most common NGS platforms used were 454 pyrosequencing (Roche Diagnostic Corporation, Risch-Rotkreuz, Switzerland) and Illumina-based technology (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA). The hypervariable regions sequenced were between the V1 and V6 regions. The patient and sample population ranged from ages 12-76 years and asymptomatic and symptomatic teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis with or without apical periodontitis. Microbial sampling was conducted directly from the infected pulp or the extracted teeth. The most abundant phyla were Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria. The most frequently detected genera were Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Parvimonas, and Streptococcus. Other notable microbial signatures at different taxa levels were identified but were widely variable between studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Technologies based on high-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA NGS can aid in deciphering the complex bacterial communities of root canal biofilms. Thus far, only a few studies have been published with relatively small sample sizes, variable sample collection protocols, and community analyses methods. Future larger clinical studies are essential with validated standardized protocols for improved understanding of the pathogenic nature of bacterial biofilm communities in root canals.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app