We have located links that may give you full text access.
Predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2018 August
BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is not common among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and its prognostic value is controversial. The purposes of this study are to identify predictors of lymph node metastasis and determine its prognostic associations.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database was performed. Patients with GISTs that underwent surgery and pathologic nodal staging were identified. Logistic regression and Cox regression were performed to identify independent predictors and prognostic factors, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 1430 patients (age: 61.5 ± 14.5 years, 52% males), 140 (9.8%) had lymph node metastasis. On multivariable analysis, distant metastasis was the only independent predictor of lymph node metastasis (OR 4.95, 95% CI: 2.43-10.08, p < 0.001). In the entire cohort, lymph node metastasis did not reflect a worse overall survival (OS, HR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.49-2.58, p = 0.794) or disease-specific survival (DSS, HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.31-2.88, p = 0.924), but was an independent predictor of worse OS in 51 patients (25.4% of 201 patients) who presented with both lymph node metastasis and synchronous distant metastasis (HR 2, 95% CI: 1.25-3.21, p = 0.004). Lymph node metastasis was also independently associated with worse survival among patients with small intestinal (OS: HR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.15-3.1, p = 0.013) and colorectal tumors (OS: HR 3.41, 95% CI: 1.56-7.46, p = 0.002, DSS: HR 3.58, 95% CI: 1.27-10.06, p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic disease is an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis in patients with GISTs. Lymph node metastasis is also associated with worse overall survival in patients with metastatic GISTs.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database was performed. Patients with GISTs that underwent surgery and pathologic nodal staging were identified. Logistic regression and Cox regression were performed to identify independent predictors and prognostic factors, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 1430 patients (age: 61.5 ± 14.5 years, 52% males), 140 (9.8%) had lymph node metastasis. On multivariable analysis, distant metastasis was the only independent predictor of lymph node metastasis (OR 4.95, 95% CI: 2.43-10.08, p < 0.001). In the entire cohort, lymph node metastasis did not reflect a worse overall survival (OS, HR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.49-2.58, p = 0.794) or disease-specific survival (DSS, HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.31-2.88, p = 0.924), but was an independent predictor of worse OS in 51 patients (25.4% of 201 patients) who presented with both lymph node metastasis and synchronous distant metastasis (HR 2, 95% CI: 1.25-3.21, p = 0.004). Lymph node metastasis was also independently associated with worse survival among patients with small intestinal (OS: HR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.15-3.1, p = 0.013) and colorectal tumors (OS: HR 3.41, 95% CI: 1.56-7.46, p = 0.002, DSS: HR 3.58, 95% CI: 1.27-10.06, p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic disease is an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis in patients with GISTs. Lymph node metastasis is also associated with worse overall survival in patients with metastatic GISTs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app