We have located links that may give you full text access.
An increase of fractional exhaled nitric oxide after specific inhalation challenge is highly predictive of occupational asthma.
PURPOSE: An increase of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been described after specific inhalation challenges (SICs) with occupational allergens, but the clinical role of FeNO measurements before and after SIC is unknown. It was the aim of this study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FeNO measurements before and after SIC in subjects with suspected occupational asthma (OA).
METHODS: One hundred forty-eight patients with suspected OA were examined by SIC with various occupational allergens. Subjects were assigned to pulmonary responders, nonresponders or doubtful by standard lung function criteria. FeNO was measured before SIC (baseline) and 24 h afterwards. Subjects with negative or doubtful SIC but increase of FeNO were evaluated individually by an overall expert rating. Effect modifiers of FeNO increases were assessed by regression analyses.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (21%) were classified as pulmonary responders, 105 (71%) as nonresponders and 12 (8%) as doubtful. With the pulmonary responder status as gold standard an increase of FeNO ≥ 13 ppb showed a specificity of 0.9 and a sensitivity of 0.5. Seventeen subjects with negative or doubtful responder status showed such an increase of FeNO, among them 13 subjects with definitive or probable OA after expert rating. Regression analyses revealed no significant modifiers for the FeNO increase.
CONCLUSION: An increase of FeNO after SIC is highly predictive of OA and should be regarded as an additional criterion for the interpretation of SIC with occupational agents.
METHODS: One hundred forty-eight patients with suspected OA were examined by SIC with various occupational allergens. Subjects were assigned to pulmonary responders, nonresponders or doubtful by standard lung function criteria. FeNO was measured before SIC (baseline) and 24 h afterwards. Subjects with negative or doubtful SIC but increase of FeNO were evaluated individually by an overall expert rating. Effect modifiers of FeNO increases were assessed by regression analyses.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (21%) were classified as pulmonary responders, 105 (71%) as nonresponders and 12 (8%) as doubtful. With the pulmonary responder status as gold standard an increase of FeNO ≥ 13 ppb showed a specificity of 0.9 and a sensitivity of 0.5. Seventeen subjects with negative or doubtful responder status showed such an increase of FeNO, among them 13 subjects with definitive or probable OA after expert rating. Regression analyses revealed no significant modifiers for the FeNO increase.
CONCLUSION: An increase of FeNO after SIC is highly predictive of OA and should be regarded as an additional criterion for the interpretation of SIC with occupational agents.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app