Exhaled nitric oxide and mannitol test to predict exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is diagnosed via exercise challenge on a treadmill, but such testing requires complex equipment and sufficient health-care resources. The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) test and mannitol bronchial provocation test (BPT) may serve as a surrogate for exercise testing.

METHODS: We compared the diagnostic utilities of the FeNO test and mannitol BPT in predicting EIB in asthmatic children. We retrospectively analyzed data from 60 asthmatic children aged 6-16 years. We compared the exercise BPT results, FeNO levels, and mannitol BPT data.

RESULTS: All subjects were divided into exercise-positive (n = 41) or -negative (n = 19) BPT groups. Of the 41 exercise-positive patients, 32 were mannitol BPT positive and nine were mannitol BPT negative. Of the 19 exercise-negative patients, nine and 10, respectively, were mannitol BPT positive and BPT negative. The maximum % forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) decrease after exercise was positively correlated with FeNO (r = 0.556, P < 0.001), and with mannitol response-dose ratio (RDR; r = 0.416, P = 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for FeNO to discriminate between asthmatic subjects with and without EIB had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.771 (95%CI: 0.643-0.870). The discriminatory ROC curve for mannitol RDR had an AUC of 0.763 (95%CI: 0.633-0.864). The AUC of FeNO and mannitol RDR did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS: EIB significantly correlated with both FeNO and mannitol BPT data. Given that both methods similarly predicted EIB in asthmatic children, the simpler and safer FeNO test alone may be a clinically useful diagnostic tool.