We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Effect of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Breast Implants: Material Analysis on Silicone and Polyurethane Prosthesis.
Annals of Plastic Surgery 2018 August
INTRODUCTION: The pathogenic mechanism underlying capsular contracture is still unknown. It is certainly a multifactorial process, resulting from human body reaction, biofilm activation, bacteremic seeding, or silicone exposure. The scope of the present article is to investigate the effect of hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol (2.66 Gy × 16 sessions) both on silicone and polyurethane breast implants.
METHODS: Silicone implants and polyurethane underwent irradiation according to a hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol for the treatment of breast cancer. After irradiation implant shells underwent mechanical, chemical, and microstructural evaluation by means of tensile testing, infrared spectra in attenuated total reflectance mode, nuclear magnetic resonance, and field emission scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: At superficial analysis, irradiated silicone samples show several visible secondary and tertiary blebs. Polyurethane implants showed an open cell structure, which closely resembles a sponge. Morphological observation of struts from treated polyurethane sample shows a more compact structure, with significantly shorter and thicker struts compared with untreated sample. The infrared spectra in attenuated total reflectance mode spectra of irradiated and control samples were compared either for silicon and polyurethane samples. In the case of silicone-based membranes, treated and control specimens showed similar bands, with little differences in the treated one. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra on the fraction soluble in CDCl3 support these observations. Tensile tests on silicone samples showed a softer behavior of the treated ones. Tensile tests on Polyurethane samples showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Polyurethane implants seem to be more resistant to radiotherapy damage, whereas silicone prosthesis showed more structural, mechanical, and chemical modifications.
METHODS: Silicone implants and polyurethane underwent irradiation according to a hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol for the treatment of breast cancer. After irradiation implant shells underwent mechanical, chemical, and microstructural evaluation by means of tensile testing, infrared spectra in attenuated total reflectance mode, nuclear magnetic resonance, and field emission scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: At superficial analysis, irradiated silicone samples show several visible secondary and tertiary blebs. Polyurethane implants showed an open cell structure, which closely resembles a sponge. Morphological observation of struts from treated polyurethane sample shows a more compact structure, with significantly shorter and thicker struts compared with untreated sample. The infrared spectra in attenuated total reflectance mode spectra of irradiated and control samples were compared either for silicon and polyurethane samples. In the case of silicone-based membranes, treated and control specimens showed similar bands, with little differences in the treated one. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra on the fraction soluble in CDCl3 support these observations. Tensile tests on silicone samples showed a softer behavior of the treated ones. Tensile tests on Polyurethane samples showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Polyurethane implants seem to be more resistant to radiotherapy damage, whereas silicone prosthesis showed more structural, mechanical, and chemical modifications.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app