We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Does periurethral cleaning with water prior to indwelling urinary catheterization increase the risk of urinary tract infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
American Journal of Infection Control 2018 December
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether periurethral cleaning with water before indwelling urinary catheterization increases the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) compared with studies using anti-infective agents.
METHODS: A literature search via MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through October 2017 and a manual search of references for additional relevant studies. Trials studying clean intermittent catheterization were excluded. Data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Results of randomized controlled trials were pooled using random effects models. Both individual and pooled risk estimates were reported using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: From 121 identified articles, 5 studies involving 824 patients were included in the review (822 patients included in meta-analysis). No statistical significance in the incidence of UTIs existed between the water group and antiseptics group (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.77-1.49; P = .89; I2 = 0%). Available data comparing water with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate demonstrated no significant difference between the incidence of UTIs (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P = .79; I2 = 0%; and RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.68-1.62; P = .72; I2 = 0%; respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on current data, water is as safe as other topical antiseptics for periurethral cleansing before indwelling urinary catheter insertion.
METHODS: A literature search via MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through October 2017 and a manual search of references for additional relevant studies. Trials studying clean intermittent catheterization were excluded. Data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Results of randomized controlled trials were pooled using random effects models. Both individual and pooled risk estimates were reported using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: From 121 identified articles, 5 studies involving 824 patients were included in the review (822 patients included in meta-analysis). No statistical significance in the incidence of UTIs existed between the water group and antiseptics group (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.77-1.49; P = .89; I2 = 0%). Available data comparing water with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate demonstrated no significant difference between the incidence of UTIs (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P = .79; I2 = 0%; and RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.68-1.62; P = .72; I2 = 0%; respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on current data, water is as safe as other topical antiseptics for periurethral cleansing before indwelling urinary catheter insertion.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app