We have located links that may give you full text access.
Outcomes of a New-Generation Stentless Aortic Valve: A Single-Center Experience with 251 Consecutive Implants.
Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2017 September
BACKGROUND: The study aim was to investigate the hemodynamic behavior over time and ease of implant and durability of the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom (SPF)® stentless pericardial aortic xenograft.
METHODS: Between March 2003 and April 2010, a total of 251 consecutive, non-selected patients (mean age 70.1 years; range: 17-89 years; 17.1% aged >80 years) received a SPF bioprosthesis as an aortic valve substitute at the authors' institution. All implantations were performed by a single surgeon using a classical, double-line, subcoronary implant technique. Of these patients. 108 (43%) underwent a concomitant procedure. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 8.3. Patients were followed for complications and hemodynamic evaluation. Echocardiographic controls and clinical data were obtained at discharge, and at six months' and eight years' follow up.
RESULTS: The in-hospital/30-day mortality was 1.2% for the entire group, but 0% for patients with isolated valve replacement. A total of 27 deaths had occurred at the time of the last follow up (22 were due to non-cardiac causes). At follow up (mean 3.7 years; range: 0-7.8 years), 91.1% of survivors were in NYHA classes I or II. Freedom from reoperation and from structural valve deterioration was 96.0% and 96.8%, respectively, at 7.8 years. The mean pressure gradient of the series (measured using echocardiography) was 10.3 ± 4.5 mmHg at discharge, and 8.3 ± 4.5mmHg at the time of the last follow up. The mean effective orifice area was 1.85 ± 0.70 cm2 for the entire series, and there was an absence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in 90% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirmed the favourable hemodynamic behavior, low risk of implantation and acceptable durability of the pericardial stentless SPF aortic prosthesis. The data also endorsed use of the SPF as an aortic valve substitute, even in a young and active population, and particularly in the presence of a small aortic annulus. The accuracy of implantation remains a crucial factor for durability and subsequent satisfactory hemodynamic performance. A longer follow up would provide further information with regards to complications and durability of the SPF prosthesis.
METHODS: Between March 2003 and April 2010, a total of 251 consecutive, non-selected patients (mean age 70.1 years; range: 17-89 years; 17.1% aged >80 years) received a SPF bioprosthesis as an aortic valve substitute at the authors' institution. All implantations were performed by a single surgeon using a classical, double-line, subcoronary implant technique. Of these patients. 108 (43%) underwent a concomitant procedure. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 8.3. Patients were followed for complications and hemodynamic evaluation. Echocardiographic controls and clinical data were obtained at discharge, and at six months' and eight years' follow up.
RESULTS: The in-hospital/30-day mortality was 1.2% for the entire group, but 0% for patients with isolated valve replacement. A total of 27 deaths had occurred at the time of the last follow up (22 were due to non-cardiac causes). At follow up (mean 3.7 years; range: 0-7.8 years), 91.1% of survivors were in NYHA classes I or II. Freedom from reoperation and from structural valve deterioration was 96.0% and 96.8%, respectively, at 7.8 years. The mean pressure gradient of the series (measured using echocardiography) was 10.3 ± 4.5 mmHg at discharge, and 8.3 ± 4.5mmHg at the time of the last follow up. The mean effective orifice area was 1.85 ± 0.70 cm2 for the entire series, and there was an absence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in 90% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirmed the favourable hemodynamic behavior, low risk of implantation and acceptable durability of the pericardial stentless SPF aortic prosthesis. The data also endorsed use of the SPF as an aortic valve substitute, even in a young and active population, and particularly in the presence of a small aortic annulus. The accuracy of implantation remains a crucial factor for durability and subsequent satisfactory hemodynamic performance. A longer follow up would provide further information with regards to complications and durability of the SPF prosthesis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app