We have located links that may give you full text access.
Impact of visual feedback on dose-volume histograms for organs at risk in postoperative radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-holding for patients treated with breast-conserving therapy: a planning study.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of visual feedback (VF) on radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-holding (DIBH), and reviewed the dose for organs at risk (OARs).
METHODS: Respiratory motions during DIBH for 15 s were monitored during planning computed tomography (CT)-scanning and simulation for 40 patients after breast-conserving surgery from June 2007 to February 2008. For 22 of 40 patients, a goggle-type liquid crystal display monitor was used for VF. The opposing tangential field was planned. The prescribed dose was 50.0 Gy in 25 fractions.
RESULTS: The mean differences of the chest wall respiratory movement in DIBH between planning CT-scanning and simulation were 4.7 ± 2.6 mm for the patients without VF and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm for those with VF (p < 0.01). The mean chest wall excursion as a whole in DIBH using VF (2.0 ± 1.0 mm) was smaller than in those without VF (4.1 ± 2.4 mm) (p < 0.01). According to reproducibility and stability parameters, 4 mm was added as a posterior margin to the clinical target volume for RT with VF, and 10 mm for those without VF. The mean heart doses were 1.3 ± 0.5 Gy with VF and 2.4 ± 1.1 Gy without VF (p < 0.01). Mean dose and max dose of right breast were significantly reduced in procedures with VF use vs. in those without VF (p < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: VF increases the accuracy of postoperative radiotherapy with DIBH, and also helps reduce the dose for OARs.
METHODS: Respiratory motions during DIBH for 15 s were monitored during planning computed tomography (CT)-scanning and simulation for 40 patients after breast-conserving surgery from June 2007 to February 2008. For 22 of 40 patients, a goggle-type liquid crystal display monitor was used for VF. The opposing tangential field was planned. The prescribed dose was 50.0 Gy in 25 fractions.
RESULTS: The mean differences of the chest wall respiratory movement in DIBH between planning CT-scanning and simulation were 4.7 ± 2.6 mm for the patients without VF and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm for those with VF (p < 0.01). The mean chest wall excursion as a whole in DIBH using VF (2.0 ± 1.0 mm) was smaller than in those without VF (4.1 ± 2.4 mm) (p < 0.01). According to reproducibility and stability parameters, 4 mm was added as a posterior margin to the clinical target volume for RT with VF, and 10 mm for those without VF. The mean heart doses were 1.3 ± 0.5 Gy with VF and 2.4 ± 1.1 Gy without VF (p < 0.01). Mean dose and max dose of right breast were significantly reduced in procedures with VF use vs. in those without VF (p < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: VF increases the accuracy of postoperative radiotherapy with DIBH, and also helps reduce the dose for OARs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app