COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Biologic Drug Effect and Particulate Embolization of Drug-Eluting Stents versus Drug-Coated Balloons in Healthy Swine Femoropopliteal Arteries.

PURPOSE: To compare the drug effect in treated vessels and downstream effects in distal skeletal muscle of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) in a healthy preclinical swine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups of treated iliofemoral arteries (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]+DES, DCB+DES, DCB+bare metal stent [BMS], and DCB alone) of 12 healthy swine were assessed, with euthanasia at 30 days. Biological drug effect was evaluated using smooth muscle cell (SMC) loss score according to both depth and circumference as well as a neointimal fibrin and medial proteoglycan scores which were compared between the 4 groups. Vascular and skeletal muscle changes in regions downstream from the treated site were also assessed histologically for evidence of emboli.

RESULTS: DESs showed greater medial SMC loss in the treated arteries irrespective of preceding DCB or PTA treatment in terms of depth (DCB+DES vs PTA+DES vs DCB+BMS vs DCB alone; median, 4.0 mm vs 3.8 mm vs 3.0 mm vs 2.2 mm; P = .009) and circumference (4.0 mm vs 3.5 mm vs 2.0 mm vs 1.2 mm, respectively; P = .007). Sections of skeletal muscles downstream from the treated arteries showed arteriolar changes of fibrinoid necrosis consistent with paclitaxel effect exclusively in the DCB groups (DCB+BMS, 26.9% of sections; DCB+DES, 14.3%; DCB alone, 19.2%; PTA+DES, 0%; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS: In the treated arteries, irrespective of preceding DCB treatment or PTA, DES treatment showed maximum drug effects vs DCB alone or in combination with BMS placement, and there was no detrimental toxic effect in DCB-treated iliofemoral arteries before DES treatment compared with PTA before DES treatment. Downstream vascular changes were exclusively seen in groups treated with DCBs.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app