Clinical usefulness of extending the proximal margin in total gastrectomies for gastric adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Surgical resection with negative margins is part of the curative treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma. Positive surgical margins are associated with worse outcome. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical usefulness of extending the proximal surgical margin in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients that underwent total gastrectomy within the time frame of 2002 and 2017 was conducted. Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma that underwent curative surgery were included. Patients were divided into three groups, depending on proximal surgical margin status: negative margin (R0), positive margin with additional resection to achieve negative margin (R1-R0), and positive margin (R1). Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. The outcome measures to evaluate were recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in the study. Thirty-seven were classified as R0, 9 as R1-R0, and 2 as R1. Fifty-two percent of the patients had clinical stage III disease. The overall surgical mortality rate was 2% and the morbidity rate was higher than 29%. The local recurrence rate was 0% in the R1-R0 group vs. 50% in the R1 group (p = 0.02). Disease-free survival was 49 months in the R1-R0 group vs. 32 months in the R1 group (p = 0.6). Overall survival was 51 months for the R1-R0 group vs. 35 months for the R1 group (p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative extension of the positive surgical margin improved the local recurrence rate but was not associated with improvement in overall survival or disease-free survival and could possibly increase postoperative morbidity.