Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Increased Hospitalizations and Overall Healthcare Utilization in Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks Compared With Antitachycardia Pacing.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of these therapies on healthcare utilization in a large patient cohort.

BACKGROUND: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) terminates ventricular tachycardia and avoids delivery of high-voltage shocks. Few data exist on the impact of shocks on healthcare resource utilization compared with ATP.

METHODS: PROVIDE (Programming Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Primary Prevention Indication) was a prospective study of patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention at 97 U.S. centers (2008 to 2010). We categorized the PROVIDE patients by the type of therapy delivered: no therapy, ATP only, or at least 1 shock. All ICD therapies, hospitalizations, and deaths were adjudicated. Cumulative cardiac hospitalizations, risk of all-cause death or cardiac hospitalization, and annual costs were compared between groups.

RESULTS: Of the 1,670 patients in PROVIDE, followed up for 18.1 ± 7.6 months, 1,316 received no therapy, 152 had ATP only, and 202 received at least 1 shock. Patients receiving no therapy and those receiving only ATP had a lower cumulative hospitalization rate and were at lower risk for death or hospitalization (hazard ratio: 0.33 [p < 0.001] and 0.33 [p < 0.002], respectively). The cost of hospitalization was $2,874 per patient-year (95% confidence interval: $877 to $5,140; p = 0.002) higher for those receiving at least 1 shock than for those who received ATP only. There was no difference in outcomes or cost between patients receiving only ATP and those without therapy.

CONCLUSIONS: Among patients implanted with an ICD for primary prevention, those who received only ATP therapy had reduced hospitalizations, mortality, and cost compared with those who received at least 1 high-voltage shock and had equivalent outcomes to patients who did not require any therapy. (Programming Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Primary Prevention Indication [PROVIDE]; NCT00743522).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app