We have located links that may give you full text access.
Benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in pediatric asthma.
Pediatric Pulmonology 2018 August
INTRODUCTION: There are limited studies evaluating the role of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in pediatric asthma.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all pediatric patients with a diagnosis of asthma enrolled in PR. Demographics, medications, and clinical records were reviewed. In addition, PFTs, 6-min walk test (6MWT), and patient/parent symptom and quality of life surveys before and after PR were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled in PR; 18 (47%) female and 20 (53%) male. Mean participant age was 11.33 ± 3.37 (range 4-19) years. Twenty-two (58%) were Caucasian and nine (24%) African American. Chart review was limited by incomplete data sets for many participants. Following PR, significant improvement was noted in mean 6MWT distance (1541 vs 1616 feet, P = 0.05) and FEV1 (89.9% of predicted versus 96.4%, P = 0.04). Survey instruments demonstrated improvement in several clinical factors, however, there was no significant change in weight following PR despite scheduled cardiovascular exercise and dietary counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: Structured PR for pediatric patients with asthma can improve 6MWT distance and FEV1 as well as subjective measures of SOB and QOL, suggesting a role for PR in the chronic management of pediatric asthma. Further prospective investigation is needed to determine if PR has positive effects on other clinical parameters of asthma control and its overall impact on childhood obesity.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all pediatric patients with a diagnosis of asthma enrolled in PR. Demographics, medications, and clinical records were reviewed. In addition, PFTs, 6-min walk test (6MWT), and patient/parent symptom and quality of life surveys before and after PR were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled in PR; 18 (47%) female and 20 (53%) male. Mean participant age was 11.33 ± 3.37 (range 4-19) years. Twenty-two (58%) were Caucasian and nine (24%) African American. Chart review was limited by incomplete data sets for many participants. Following PR, significant improvement was noted in mean 6MWT distance (1541 vs 1616 feet, P = 0.05) and FEV1 (89.9% of predicted versus 96.4%, P = 0.04). Survey instruments demonstrated improvement in several clinical factors, however, there was no significant change in weight following PR despite scheduled cardiovascular exercise and dietary counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: Structured PR for pediatric patients with asthma can improve 6MWT distance and FEV1 as well as subjective measures of SOB and QOL, suggesting a role for PR in the chronic management of pediatric asthma. Further prospective investigation is needed to determine if PR has positive effects on other clinical parameters of asthma control and its overall impact on childhood obesity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app