Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment of breast mass morphology with diffusion-weighted MRI: Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient.

BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a noncontrast-enhanced MRI technique. There are new promising studies on the use of DWI as a part of the enhanced or unenhanced abbreviated breast MRI protocols.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of breast DWI in the assessment of mass morphology and determine the contribution of this morphologic evaluation in their characterization.

STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.

POPULATION: In all, 213 consecutive women were breast MR imaged and had a later confirmed diagnosis.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) and DWI at 1.5T.

ASSESSMENT: After Institutional Review Board approval, two radiologists first independently, and later in consensus, evaluated the visibility and morphology of the 143 malignant, 70 benign masses on DWI and DCE-MRI in separate sessions, blindly. Shape, margin, and internal pattern of the masses were evaluated according to BI-RADS lexicon. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor size were measured by one radiologist.

STATISTICAL TESTS: Consistency between imaging methods and readers was evaluated with Cohen's kappa statistics. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the best predictors of malignancy.

RESULTS: Tumor visibility on DWI was high to moderate in at least 88% of cases. Consistency between DWI and DCE-MRI was substantial (kappa ≥0.757) for shape and margin and moderate (kappa = 0.505) for internal pattern. Interobserver agreement was substantial to moderate for all morphologic parameters (kappa ≥0.596). Morphology evaluated on DWI provided 83-84% accuracy in discriminating malignant from benign masses. ADC alone provided 90-91% accuracy. Both morphologic parameters and ADC were significantly associated with malignancy on multivariate analysis and provided 91-93% accuracy.

DATA CONCLUSION: DWI might be used not only for ADC evaluation but also for the morphological evaluation of breast masses to characterize them.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1668-1677.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app