JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Quantitative evaluation of linked rigid-body representations of the trunk.

Gait & Posture 2018 June
BACKGROUND: The trunk is often simplified as a small number of rigid-body segments to reduce the complexity of its multi-segmental structure. However, such rigid-body representations of the trunk may overlook its flexible movement owing to its multi-segmental structure.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study is to quantitatively assess the effects of the deformability on the resultant trunk kinematics when the trunk is modeled with numerous rigid-body segments.

METHODS: Three-dimensional kinematic data of 10 male subjects were obtained during static and dynamic trials. The trunk in both static and dynamic trials was modeled as a single rigid-body segment or as two, three, or six linked rigid-body segments, and a non-linear optimization analysis was performed to minimize the difference between the actual and modeled position data. Position errors were evaluated to assess the difference in three-dimensional positions between the actual and modeled data for each model. The total angular displacement was evaluated to examine to what extent each model describes the actual multi-segmental trunk movement.

RESULTS: The position error between the modeled and actual kinematic data of the trunk was up to 12 mm and 11 mm when the trunk was simplified as one segment, but the error decreased to 5 mm and 7 mm when the trunk was modeled with six segments during the static and dynamic trials, respectively. The total angular displacement increased as the number of rigid-body segments increased during both trials.

SIGNIFICANCE: These results imply that a small number of linked rigid-body representations underestimates the actual multi-segmental trunk movement during dynamic movement. These findings are useful in determining the optimal number of rigid-body segments for analysis of the trunk.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app