JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Clinical treatment of erectile dysfunction in type 2 diabeticpatients in the high-altitude area].

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of pancreatic kininogenase combined with sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction(ED) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in the high-altitude area.

METHODS: This study included 93 ED patients with type 2 DM, all residents of the Xining area 1500 meters above sea level. We randomly divided them into an experimental group (n = 48) and a control group (n = 45), the former treated with pancreatic kininogenase(120 u, tid) and sildenafil (25 mg, qd at bedtime), while the latter with sildenafil only (25 mg, qd at bedtime).After 4 and 8 weeks of medication, we obtained the penile hemodynamic parameters,IIEF-5 scores, and sexual intercourse satisfaction(SIS) scores and compared them between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age or DM course between the two groups of patients (P >0.05).Compared with the baseline, both the experimental and control groups showed remarkably improvement inthe IIEF-5 score (8.81 ± 2.06 vs 11.54 ± 7.72 and 8.29 ± 1.91 vs 9.37± 1.65, P <0.05), SIS score (3.35 ± 2.43vs6.83± 2.61and 3.41 ± 2.38 vs 4.92± 2.49, P <0.05), and penile hemodynamic parameters obtained by color duplex Doppler ultrasonography(P <0.05), with significant differences between the two groups in the IIEF-5 score (11.54 ± 7.72 vs 9.37± 1.65, P <0.05) and SIS score (6.83± 2.61 vs 4.92± 2.49, P <0.05) but not in the penile hemodynamic parameters (P >0.05). Even more remarkable improvement was observed at 8 weeks in the experimental and control groups in the IIEF-5 score (19.29± 1.85 and 15.43± 1.74)(P <0.05), SIS score (11.73 ± 2.57 and 6.55± 2.71) (P <0.05), and penile hemodynamic parameters(P <0.05), all with significant differences between the two groups (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic kininogenase combined with sildenafil has a better clinical effect than sildenafil alone on ED in type 2 DM patientsin the high-altitude area.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app