Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Standard and low-dose cone beam computer tomography protocol for orthognatodontic diagnosis: a comparative evaluation.

Considering the diagnostic capability offered by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), nowadays orthodontists often use this exam for treatment planning, especially in cases of impacted teeth, maxillary ipoplasia, orthognathic surgery etc. The aim of this study was to compare the radiation doses related to a conventional CBCT setting and that of a low dose protocol, usable in orthodontic practice. The absorbed organ doses were measured using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermo-luminescent dosimeters related to sensitive organs (brain, bone marrow, salivary glands, thyroid, esophagus, oral mucosa, extrathoracic airways, lymph nodes). The device used was a MyRay Hyperion X9-11x5. The standard setting of the apparatus was 90 Kv, 36 mAs, CTDI/Vol 4.09 mGy, instead the low dose one was 90 Kv, 27 mAs, CTDI/Vol 2.89 mGy. Equivalent and effective doses have been calculated; the measurement of the effective doses was based on the ICRP recommendations. For the assessment of image quality, five readers, independent and experienced orthodontists, were asked to state if the images were sufficient enough to perform an orthodontic diagnosis. The lowest organ dose (5.01 microSv) was received by the esophagus during low dose CBCT acquisition. The highest mean organ dose instead (1227.67 microSv) was received by the salivary glands during conventional setting CBCT acquisition. Image quality has been considered sufficient for orthodontic diagnostic needs for both CBCT protocols. CBCT low dose setting should be preferred over the standard one in orthodontic practice, because it provides a significant lower radiation dose to the patients ensuring a good image quality. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the opportunity of CBCT exams in orthodontic treatment planning.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app