We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine.
Indian Heart Journal 2018 March
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated.
METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II-IV, baseline HR>70/min), 125 patients were randomized to standard therapy (beta blockers, ACEI, diuretics, n=62) or add-on Ivabradine (titrated to maximum 7.5mg BD, n=63). Beta-blockers were titrated in both the groups.
RESULTS: At 3 months both groups had improvement in NYHA class, 6min walk test, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores and fall in BNP, however the magnitude of change was greater in Ivabradine group. Those on Ivabradine also had lower LV volumes, higher LVEF (28.8±3.6 vs 27.2±0.5, p=0.01) and more favorable LV global strain (11±1.7vs 12.2±1.1, p=<0.001), MPI (0.72±0.1 vs 0.6±0.1, p=<0.001), LV mass (115.2±30 vs 131.4±35, p=0.007), LV wall stress (219.8±46 vs 238±54) and calculated LV work (366±101 vs 401±102, p=0.05). The benefit of Ivabradine was sustained at 6 months follow up. The % change in HR was significantly higher in Ivabradine group (-32.2% vs -19.3%, p=0.001) with no difference in blood pressure. Resting HR<70/min was achieved in 96.8% vs 27.9%, respectively in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Addition of Ivabradine to standard therapy in patients with DCM and symptomatic HF and targeting a heart rate<70/min improves symptoms, quality of life and various echocardiographic parameters.
METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II-IV, baseline HR>70/min), 125 patients were randomized to standard therapy (beta blockers, ACEI, diuretics, n=62) or add-on Ivabradine (titrated to maximum 7.5mg BD, n=63). Beta-blockers were titrated in both the groups.
RESULTS: At 3 months both groups had improvement in NYHA class, 6min walk test, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores and fall in BNP, however the magnitude of change was greater in Ivabradine group. Those on Ivabradine also had lower LV volumes, higher LVEF (28.8±3.6 vs 27.2±0.5, p=0.01) and more favorable LV global strain (11±1.7vs 12.2±1.1, p=<0.001), MPI (0.72±0.1 vs 0.6±0.1, p=<0.001), LV mass (115.2±30 vs 131.4±35, p=0.007), LV wall stress (219.8±46 vs 238±54) and calculated LV work (366±101 vs 401±102, p=0.05). The benefit of Ivabradine was sustained at 6 months follow up. The % change in HR was significantly higher in Ivabradine group (-32.2% vs -19.3%, p=0.001) with no difference in blood pressure. Resting HR<70/min was achieved in 96.8% vs 27.9%, respectively in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Addition of Ivabradine to standard therapy in patients with DCM and symptomatic HF and targeting a heart rate<70/min improves symptoms, quality of life and various echocardiographic parameters.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app